William Bradley appears to have been the first to describe the exchange of Mount William stone on 12 November 1838: In 1854
William Blandowski, the first zoologist at the
Melbourne Museum, visited Mount William and provided the first written description:
The celebrated spot which supplies the natives with stone (phonolite) for their tomahawks, and of which I had been informed by the tribes 400 miles distant.
Having observed on the tops of these hills a multitude of fragments of stones which appeared to have been broken artificially.
Here I unexpectedly found the deserted quarries () of the aboriginals... which extend over an area of upwards of one hundred acres, present an appearance somewhat similar to that of a deserted goldfield, and convey a faithful idea of the great determination displayed by the aboriginals. William Buckley, described a hard black stone he called
Kar-keen which was shaped into stone heads. In the 1880s prominent
Wurundjeri leader and custodian of the quarry,
William Barak (who probably witnessed the final operations at the quarry) described the traditional ownership and access conventions to ethnographer,
Alfred Howitt. Organised excursions were popular in the early 1900s, as when the District Teachers Association organised an excursion in 1906 and the day was "proclaimed a public holiday in the
Shire of Lancefield (sic), so that an opportunity will be afforded to all to be present." In the 1940s,
Fred McCarthy identified a south-east Australia route associated with Mount William among his seven trunk-trade routes. In the 1960s and 1970s, Mt William drew the attention of anthropologists and archaeologists (notably including
Donald Thomson and
Isabel McBryde). McBryde's study of trade systems in the 1970s included investigation of the distribution of axes from Mount William and other quarries in Victoria and New South Wales drawing on ethno-historical sources, linguistic and archaeological evidence and petrological studies (using thin section analysis for axes from archaeological sites and stone sources), to reveal distribution trends and social value. McBryde showed Aboriginal exchange networks for Mount William stone extended several hundred kilometres. with distribution determined by the social and political relations between the Kulin and neighbouring groups: sparsely distributed or absent in south-eastern Victoria but more widely distributed in Western Victoria. ==Management and conservation==