The novel has been somewhat neglected, possibly overshadowed by the simultaneous debuts of
Philip Roth,
John Updike, and
Richard Yates. By 1962, when critic Michael Robbins stated that
Mrs. Bridge answered the question posed by writers and social critics regarding "what kind of people we are producing, what kinds of lives we are leading," the novel was already out of print. At that time, readers of
College Composition and Communication were encouraged to write to the publisher to advocate for a reprint. In 1982, when both
Mrs. Bridge and
Mr. Bridge were republished, Brooks Landon, writing in
The Iowa Review, remarked that "Connell seems to have become one of those writers we know to respect but may not have read." Although it has remained relatively under the radar, writers and critics continue to praise its sensitivity and significance. Tom Cox, writing in
The Guardian, described it as "one of the sharper novels about mid-20th-century domestic life." Critic Mark Oppenheimer, writing in
The Believer, referred to
Mrs. Bridge as one of Connell's "three classics of
WASP repression," alongside
Mr. Bridge and
The Connoisseur. American novelist
James Patterson, who has cited Mrs. Bridge as the novel that most influenced him (a view shared by novelist
Joshua Ferris British critic Matthew Dennison, who commended the novel's "studiedly simple, undecorated prose, with few rhetorical flourishes," compared Mrs. Bridge to
Jan Struther's
Mrs. Miniver. Both characters inhabit "an interwar world shaped by a promise of certainties — domestic, social, cultural, and sexual — which are never wholly realized and remain frustratingly elusive." Over the years,
Mrs. Bridge has continued to be taught in universities as part of modern literature, creative writing (particularly in discussions of the vignette form), and social and cultural theory curricula. ==Publication history==