In April 2024,
Washington Post journalist Thomas Floyd met with eight notable actresses who have portrayed Mrs. Lovett. In their article, Floyd met with
Julia McKenzie (1993 revival, National Theatre in London),
Christine Baranski (1999, Ahmanson Theatre in Los Angeles, CA, and 2002, Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C.),
Patti LuPone (2000, London Philharmonic, 2001, San Francisco Symphony, and 2005 Broadway revival in New York City, NY),
Helena Bonham Carter (2007, film adaptation),
Lea Salonga (2019, Theatre at Solaire in Manila, Sands Theatre in Singapore), Bryonha Marie (2023, Signature Theatre in Arlington, VA),
Annaleigh Ashford (2023 Broadway revival in New York City, NY), and
Sutton Foster (2024, replaced Ashford in Broadway revival). The performers agreed that playing the iconic role was a great honor, and also a great responsibility. Both Baranski and LuPone recalled feeling intimidated when finding out they had been cast. Baranski recalled
Stephen Sondheim stating that she was going to have fun playing the role, to which Baranski responded: "Fun? This is like scaling a mountain. This is terrifying." The actresses took different approaches to preparing for the role. Baranski read
London Labour and the London Poor by Henry Mayhew to take a deeper look into the priorities of a lower-class woman in Victorian England. Ashford, Salonga, Bonham Carter, and LuPone all revisited previous performances, including
Angela Lansbury’s originating performance in 1979. Others took a more personal approach, such as Marie, who drew from her culture and background as a black woman to develop the character. The performers also voiced differences in their interpretations of the role. McKenzie saw Mrs. Lovett less as a villain and more as a product of her circumstances, whereas LuPone saw her as a manipulator and the true villain of the story. Foster, Bonham Carter, and Solonga agree that Mrs. Lovett’s desperate need for love leads to her eventual demise, and LuPone theorized that the first lie she tells at the top of the show leads the character down the path of manipulation that leads to her fate. Ashford describes Mrs. Lovett’s arc as
Shakespearean in how wild, broad, and grounded it is, and compared the character to
Puck. == References ==