Training variables, in the context of strength training, such as frequency, intensity, and total volume all directly affect the increase of muscle hypertrophy.
Time under tension and contraction types (eccentric versus concentric) affect hypertrophy as well. A gradual increase in all of these training variables will yield muscular hypertrophy. Resistance training activates key anabolic pathways. Many crucial ones to hypertrophy include mTORC1 that stimulate satellite cell activity, both of which play central roles in promoting increases in muscle fiber size.
Range of motion Range of motion (ROM) is also seen as another possible factor to induce hypertrophy. Training through a full ROM, particularly at elongated muscle lengths, has been shown to enhance hypertrophy compared to partial ROM. For example, deep squats and full-ROM deadlifts increase mechanical tension on muscle fibers, particularly in the stretched position, which may stimulate greater muscle growth. Partial ROM training at longer muscle lengths has also been found to promote hypertrophy, potentially due to increased muscle damage.
Time under tension Time under tension (TUT) is the duration of time that the muscle being trained is stressed during a repetition. There are multiple methods to introduce TUT in each repetition of an exercise, either by slowing down the eccentric or concentric phases, or by stopping at certain phases of the exercise. TUT has been proposed to increase muscle hypertrophy because slower repetition tempos increase muscular activity. Research comparing repetition tempos shows mixed results. Burd et al. (2012) reported that slower tempos increased acute mitochondrial and myofibrillar protein synthesis, while other studies found that traditional tempos produced greater hypertrophy in untrained individuals, suggesting that moderate tempos may be most effective. This can increase the muscle protein synthesis for an extended period. A study done by Burd et al. (2012) showed that at relatively light loads (30% of best effort) slow contractions (6-second concentric and 6-second eccentric) performed to failure compared to faster contractions (1-second concentric and 1-second eccentric), slow contractions had not only higher rates of acute mitochondrial and sarcoplasmic protein synthesis but also had significant rates of delayed stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis 24 to 30 hours after the exercise was done. However, other research conflicts with this information. In a study done by Shneuke et al., groups of "untrained" individuals underwent slow-speed training (10-second concentric and 4-second eccentric) and normal-speed training. The slow-speed group had some increases in type IIA and IIX fibers, but the greatest increases occurred in the normal-speed group. This shows that although TUT can have some adaptations in fibers, load and intensity are more important for hypertrophy. The literature suggests that moderate tempos give the best results for hypertrophy (between 2 and 8 seconds), while extremely slow tempos may restrict hypertrophy by limiting the amount of load that can be lifted, limiting progressive overload. On the other hand, very rapid tempos shorten TUT and reduce the stimulus a muscle receives for hypertrophic adaptation.
Eccentric contraction emphasis Main Article: Eccentric training An eccentric contraction occurs when a muscle lengthens under tension. This is different from concentric contraction, which is when the muscle producing force shortens. For example, during the lowering phase of squat or bench press, the external load is greater than the muscle's force output, and so the fibers lengthen under tension. Lifting the weight back up requires the muscles to have a higher force output than the external load, resulting in fibers shortening in the concentric phase. This higher mechanical tension is considered essential for growth. Additionally, eccentric exercise causes a significant increase in exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), as seen by the microlesions in muscle fibers, sarcolemmal disruption, and an inflammatory response that leads to delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). There is also evidence to support that eccentric contractions activate specific molecular pathways, which cause greater anabolic signaling and gene expression than concentric contractions. This is shown in the structural remodeling differences in the muscle when comparing the two training contractions. Eccentric training seems to cause a greater increase in fascicle length (sacromeres are added in series), while concentric training leads to an increase in the pennation angle (sacromeres are added in parallel). One 8-week study found that subjects training with the same intensity, one with primarily eccentric contractions, increased muscle fiber mass by approximately 40%, while the concentric contraction group showed no change. However, this difference might not be the same when the total load is matched between training types. When matched for load, the increase in muscle volume seems to be the same between concentric and eccentric training. The concept of eccentric overload, where the eccentric phase is loaded with more weight than the concentric phase, is a strategy that advanced lifters use to maximize hypertrophic stimulus. This method works because of the unique properties of the eccentric phase mentioned above. Due to the low metabolic cost relative to the high force production, eccentric exercise is also used for rehabilitation training, especially for elderly patients with chronic conditions who are unable to perform strenuous activity. Collectively, the evidence suggests that eccentric contractions can produce substantial muscle hypertrophy due to the high force production and unique molecular signaling. It might not be superior to concentric training if matched for total load and reps. ==Changes in protein synthesis and muscle cell biology associated with stimuli==