On November 28, 2000, Ukrainian politician
Oleksandr Moroz publicly accused President Kuchma of involvement in the murder of Gongadze, naming Melnychenko as the source of information and playing selected recordings to journalists, starting the 'Cassette Scandal'. Days earlier Melnychenko had fled Ukraine to
Ostrava in the
Czech Republic, where he left several bags containing dozens of CDs storing thousands of
digital recordings. Melnychenko left Ukraine covertly with his family, breaking an official prohibition on leaving the country. Melnychenko claimed that he acted alone when recording the President's conversations and then publishing them abroad. According to Melnychenko, he put an amateur
digital dictaphone under a sofa in Kuchma's office and was changing it every time he inspected the room. As the Major states, he was motivated purely by his disillusionment with what he perceived as the extremely corrupt nature of Kuchma's
regime and "decided to document evidences of crimes" committed by the President. After the disappearance of
Georgiy Gongadze, he supposedly decided to publish the recordings and protect his life. Then Melnychenko turned to his political sympathizer Oleksander Moroz for help, and received it. Later, Melnychenko moved to the
United States and received
political asylum there. His tapes were eventually made available to the United States
intelligence services and examined to determine their
authenticity and content. The authenticity of the whole file of tapes remains officially unconfirmed. However, U.S.
forensic experts have officially analyzed the section of tapes concerning
Iraq issues and found it authentic. The
Ukrainian authorities have issued an international
search warrant for Melnychenko, claiming that he is an 'important witness' and possible traitor of state secrets. However, no evidence of forced return or assassination efforts against Melnychenko were made public. Many experts and journalists find Melnychenko's story highly questionable. In particular, they argue that: • It is not clear why or how exactly Melnychenko started the operation. Being a career tech agent, he has never been involved in any kind of
intelligence, analysis or
criminal investigation. Thus, he was unlikely to have information on the President's committing
judicially proven crimes. • The means of recording described by Melnychenko seems odd, both in technical and operative terms. Indeed, it is impossible to record about 500 hours of conversations by simply changing amateur
dictaphone once a day. Melnychenko's former commanding officers argue that even a very small device would be easily discovered during routine searches of the room conducted by several agents. • The original device(s) used for recording, as well as the full file of recordings, have never been presented to journalists or Ukrainian prosecutors. Besides, Melnychenko should have known that a recording copied from
digital recorder will not be found authentic, making the whole idea of "documenting evidences" a nonsense. Nevertheless, experts and politicians analyzing the recordings agree that at least some of them are real, judging by known voices, speaking manners and confidential details mentioned. A few politicians, including Kuchma himself, have officially claimed they recognize their own voices on the tapes. However, the President and his supporters have always denied the authenticity of the body of conversations recorded, calling them a "
montage". On the other hand, in 2002
Bruce Koenig, of the US forensic firm
Bek Tek, a former worker in the
FBI's forensic laboratory, examined the recordings and concluded that there were no signs of them having been doctored. ==Events following the scandal==