The "discovery" excited international interest and many physicists worked to replicate the effects. However, the notable physicists
Lord Kelvin,
William Crookes,
Otto Lummer, and
Heinrich Rubens failed to do so. Following his own failure, self-described as "wasting a whole morning", the American physicist
Robert W. Wood, who had a reputation as a popular "debunker" of nonsense during the period, was prevailed upon by the
British journal
Nature to travel to Blondlot's laboratory in France to investigate further. Wood suggested that Rubens should go since he had been the most embarrassed when
Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany asked him to repeat the French experiments and, after two weeks, Rubens had to report his failure to do so. Rubens, however, felt it would look better if Wood went since Blondlot had been most polite in answering his many questions. In the darkened room during Blondlot's demonstration, Wood surreptitiously removed an essential
prism from the experimental apparatus, yet the experimenters still said that they observed N-rays. Wood also stealthily swapped a large
file that was supposed to be giving off N-rays with an inert piece of wood, yet the N-rays were still "observed". His report on these investigations were published in
Nature, and they suggested that the N-rays were a purely subjective phenomenon, with the scientists involved having recorded data that matched their expectations. There is reason to believe that Blondlot in particular was misled by his laboratory assistant, who confirmed all observations. By 1905, no one outside of Nancy believed in N-rays, but Blondlot himself is reported to have still been convinced of their existence in 1926. but there is evidence that this is at least some exaggeration of the facts. ==Significance==