Befitting a genus with a confusing
taxonomic history, the name of this genus is based on an error. David Gillette and David Thomas collected the
type and only known specimen from what was thought to be the Naashoibito Member of the Kirtland Formation, the youngest member of the Kirtland; this was commemorated in the name. Instead, it came from the older,
late Campanian-age De-na-zin Member. Horner described the skull in 1992 as that of an
immature Kritosaurus, using it as evidence that
Gryposaurus was different from
Kritosaurus. When the disconnect became apparent, Hunt and Lucas gave the specimen its own generic name, because the skull did not agree with an edmontosaur, and they considered
Kritosaurus indeterminate and thus not usable. Their assessment was challenged in 2000 by Thomas Williamson, who found the morphological differences between it and
Kritosaurus to be due to the skulls in question being from individuals of different ages. Unlike Hunt and Lucas, he considered the type skull of
Kritosaurus to be diagnostic and thus could compare it to
Naashoibitosaurus. He returned to Horner's argument, noting as Horner had that the nasal crest in other hadrosaurines like
Prosaurolophus moves back on the skull during growth. He also pointed out that the specimen's
provenance was incorrect; instead of being from younger rocks than
Kritosaurus, it is from rocks of about the same age. A 2014 study agreed with previous authors that
Naashoibitosaurus is similar to
Kritosaurus, but found it to be a distinct species. ==Description==