Tharavad Nairs operated a matrilineal (
marumakkathayam) joint family structure called
tharavad, whereby descendant families of one common ancestress lived under a single roof.
Tharavads consisting of 50 to 80 members were not uncommon and some with membership as high as 200 have been reported. Only the women lived in the main house; men lived in separate rooms and, on some occasions, lived in a separate house nearby. The families split on instances when they became unwieldy and during crisis among its members. When it split, the family property was separated along the female lines. The
karnavan, the oldest male member in the
tharavad, had the decision-making authority including the power to manage common property.
Panikkar, a well-known writer from the Nair community, wrote in 1918 that, The husband visited the
tharavad at night and left the following morning and he had no legal obligation to his children which lay entirely with the
karnavan. In Nair families, young men and women about the same age were not allowed to talk to each other, unless the young man's sister was considerably older than him. The wife of
karnavan had an unusual relationship in his
tharavad as she belonged to a different one and her interests lay there. Panikkar wrote that
Karnavan loved his sister's son more than his own and he believes it was due mainly to the instability of Nair marriages. Divorce rate was very high as both man and woman had equal right to terminate the marriage.
Enangar was another family with which a
tharavad remained closely related; a few such related families formed a social group whose members participated in all social activities. Nakane wrote in 1956 that
tharavads as a functional unit had ceased to exist and large buildings that had once hosted large
tharavads were occupied by just a few of its remnants. None of the rituals survive in any significant way today. Two forms of ritual marriage were traditional: • the pre-puberty rite for girls known as
thalikettu kalyanam, which was usually followed by
sambandham when they became sexually mature. The
sambandham was the point at which the woman might take one or more partners and bear children by them, giving rise to the theories of them engaging in
polyandrous practices. A ritual called the
tirandukuli marked the first menstruation and usually took place between these two events. • a form of hypergamy, whereby high-ranked Nairs married Samantans, Kshatriyas and Brahmins. There is much debate about whether the traditional Nair rituals fitted the traditional definition of marriage and which of
thalikettu kalyanam or
sambandham could lay claim to it. Thomas Nossiter has commented that the system "was so loosely arranged as to raise doubts as to whether 'marriage' existed at all."
Thalikettu kalyanam The
thali is an emblem shaped like a leaf and which is worn as a necklace. The wearing of it has been compared to a wedding ring as for most women in south India it denotes that they are married. The
thalikettu kalyanam was the ritual during which the
thali would be tied on a piece of string around the neck of a Nair girl. If the girl should reach puberty before the ceremony took place then she would in theory have been out-caste, although it is probable that this stricture was not in fact observed. since some people probably would refuse to act as tier in order to disassociate themselves from a group and thereby bolster their claims to be members of a higher group. Although information is far from complete, those who tied the
thali for girls of the aristocratic Nair families of
Cochin in Central Kerala appear to have been usually Samantans, who were of higher rank, or occasionally the Kshatriyas, who were still higher. The Nambudiri Brahmins of Central Kerala acted in that role for the royal house of Cochin (who were Kshatriyas), but whether they did so for other Kshatriyas is less certain. The Kshatriyas would tie for the Samantans. Having the
thali of each girl tied by a different man was more prestigious than having one tier perform the rite for several girls. The
thali tying was followed by four days of feasting, and on the fourth day the marriage was dissolved. The girl often never saw the man who tied the
thali again and later married a different man during the
sambandham. However, although she neither mourned the death of her
sambandham husband nor became a widow, she did observe certain mourning rituals upon the death of the man who had tied her
thali. Panikkar argues that this proves that the real, religious marriage is the
thalikettu kalyanam, although he also calls it a "mock marriage". He believes that it may have come into existence to serve as a religious demarcation point. Sexual morality was lax, especially outside the higher ranks, and both relationship break-ups and realignments were common; the
thali kalyanam legitimised the marital status of the woman in the eyes of her faith prior to her becoming involved in the amoral activities that were common practice. It has been noted that there were variations to the practice. Examples include that the person who tied the
thali might be a close female relative, such as the girl's mother or aunt, and that the ceremony conducted by such people might take place outside a temple or as a small ceremony at the side of a more lavish
thalikettu kalyanam rather than in the
tharavadu. These variations were probably exceptional and would have applied to the poorest families. Fuller has also remarked that if each girl had her own
thali tier, rather than one being used to perform the ritual for several girls at the same ceremony, then this presented the possibility of a subsequent divergence of status with the matrilineal line of the
tharavadu, leading to more subdivisions and a greater chance that one or more of the girls might advance their status later in life.
Sambandham Panikkar says that for Nairs the real marriage, as opposed to a symbolic one, was
sambandham, a word that comes from
Sanskrit and translates as "good and close union". The Nair woman had
sambandham relationships with Brahmins and Kshatriyas, as well as other Nairs. He is of the opinion that the system existed principally to facilitate the wedding of Nair women to Nambudiri Brahmins. In the Malabar region, only the eldest male member of a Brahmin family was usually allowed to marry within their caste. There were some circumstances in which a younger male was permitted to do so, these being with the consent of the elder son or when he was incapable of marriage. This system was designed to protect their traditions of patrilineality and
primogeniture. A consequence of it was that the younger sons were allowed to marry women from the highest subdivisions of the Nair caste. The Nair women could marry the man who had tied their
thali, provided that he was not otherwise restricted by the rules that women were not permitted to marry a man from a lower caste or subdivision, nor to marry anyone in the direct matrilineal line of descent (however far back that may be) or close relatives in the patrilineal line, nor a man less than two years her senior. The
sambandham ceremony was simple compared to the
thalikettu kalyanam, being marked by the gift of clothes (
pudava) to the bride in front of some family members of both parties to the arrangement. There might also be other gifts, presented at the time of the main Malayalam festivals. If the
sambandham partner was a Brahmin man or the woman's father's sister's son (which was considered a proper marriage because it was outside the direct line of female descent) then the presentation was a low-key affair. However,
sambandham rituals were more elaborate, sometimes including feasts, when a "stranger" from within the Nair caste married the woman. The ceremony took place on a day deemed to be auspicious by priests. It has also been argued that the practice, along with judicious selection of the man who tied the
thali, formed a part of the Nair aspirational culture whereby they would seek to improve their status within the caste. Furthermore, that Although it is certain that in theory hypergamy can cause a shortage of marriageable women in the lowest ranks of a caste and promote upwards social movement from the lower Nair subdivisions, the numbers involved would have been very small. It was not a common practice outside the higher subcaste groups.
Polyandry Fuller argues that there is overwhelming evidence that Nair women as well as men had more than one
sambandham partner at the same time, that "both men and women could have several partners at once, and either party was free to break the relationship, for any reason or for none, whenever they wished." He believes that both polyandrous
sambandhams and hypergamy were most common in Central Kerala. In northern Travancore there appears not to have been as great a prevalence of hypergamy because of a relative scarcity of Brahmins living there. Fuller believes that in the relatively undocumented southern Travancore
monogamy may have been predominant, and that although the matrilineal joint family still applied it was usually the case that the wife lived with the
tharavad of her husband. Nancy Levine and Walter Sangree state that while Nair women were maritally involved with a number of men, the men were also married to more than one woman. The women and their husbands did not live together and their relationship had no meaning other than "sexual liaison" and legitimacy for the children. Gough has gone further than Fuller with regard to the interpretation of events in the north, believing that there is no evidence of polyandry in that area at all. She argues that all European travelogues describing polyandry came from the region of Central Kerala. Gough notes the differing personal experiences of earlier Nair commentators and that this could go some way to explaining the varied pronouncement: Panikkar, who queries the existence of polyandry, comes from the northern Travancore region; that
A. Aiyappan, who acknowledges its existence, comes from Central Kerala; and that both have based their writings on customs they grew up with in their very different environs. A possible reason for the various rates of change across the region lies in the extent to which the various agrarian local economies were dominated by the Nairs. Nossiter cites this as one reason why it was "congruent with the role of a military caste in a feudal society." and explains that the decline in the traditional warrior role, the rise of an economy based on money, together with the ending of agricultural slavery and the effects of western education, all combined to cause the decline of the traditional practices. All of these factors were having an impact during the 19th century and they caused erosion of the social dominance which the Nairs once held, eventually reaching a point some time between
World War I and
World War II where that dominance was lost, The main beneficiaries in the shifting balance of social influence were the Syrian Christians and the Ezhavas. The former, in particular, were in a position to acquire, often by subdivision, the economically unviable
tharavad buildings and landholdings around the time of the
Great Depression. The role of the Nair Service Society in successfully campaigning for continued changes in practices and legislation relating to marriage and inheritance also played its part. == Demographics ==