Steindachner first described the species in 1876, making it the second of what are now nineteen species in the genus to be described. The taxonomy for the entire genus was for many decades the subject of heated debate, resulting in numerous conflicting revisions, leaving the genus for long periods in a state which has been aptly described as 'chaotic.'
N. unifasciatus was often at the center of this controversy, for several reasons.
N. unifasciatus is broadly distributed throughout the
Amazon basin,
Brazil, the
Guiana Shield,
Colombia,
Venezuela, and northern
Bolivia. As a result, the species is
polychromatic, with many geographic populations manifesting subtle differences in color pattern. Over the years, some of these color morphs have been erroneously described as separate species. Further taxonomic confusion arose when various authors erected other genera for
Nannostomus unifasciatus and its congeners,
Nannostomus eques and
Nannostomus harrisoni. Confounding the situation still further, Dutch naturalist J. J. Hoedeman published a paper in
The Amsterdam Naturalist in 1950 that put forth that
N. unifasciatus and
N. eques were the same species. Consensus was finally achieved when, in his seminal paper on the genus
Nannostomus in 1975, Dr.
Stanley Howard Weitzman restored Steindachner's taxonomy and expanded upon it, reaffirming the status of
N. unifasciatus and
N. eques as distinct and individuated species, and placing
N. unifasciatus and all of its congeners in one genus,
Nannostomus. As a result,
Poecilobrycon ocellatus,
Nannobrycon unifasciatus, and similar epithets formerly applied to the species, are now relegated to
junior synonyms to
N. unifasciatus. A population of the species has been discovered on the island of
Trinidad, but it is believed to have been introduced. ==Habitat==