United States annexation In 1893, during the
Hawaiian rebellions of 1887–1895 and after the ascension of
Queen Liliʻuokalani to the Hawaiian Throne in 1891,
Sanford Dole created the "Committee of Safety", who
overthrew the monarchy. This was in part due to the Queen's rejection of the 1887 Constitution, which severely limited her authority. This diminished traditional governance and installed a US-backed, plantation-led government. One reason for the overthrow was over
Kalākaua's unwillingness to sign the amended Treaty of Reciprocity that would have damaged Hawaiian trade, and opened up part of Oʻahu for the
Pearl Harbor military base. The event was challenged by
Grover Cleveland, but was eventually supported by President
William McKinley in his
Manifest Destiny plan, which harmed indigenous peoples in the continental United States and Hawaiʻi. The change left
Kānaka Maoli as the only major indigenous group with no "nation-to-nation" negotiation status and without any degree of self determination.
Native American Programs Act In 1974, the Native American Programs Act was amended to include
Kānaka Maoli. This paved the way for
Kānaka Maoli to become eligible for some federal assistance programs originally intended for
continental Native Americans. Today, Title 45 CFR Part 1336.62 defines a Native Hawaiian as "an individual any of whose ancestors were natives of the area which consists of the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778".
United States apology resolution On November 23, 1993,
U.S. President Bill Clinton signed United States Public Law 103–150, also known as the
Apology Resolution, which had previously passed Congress. This resolution "apologizes to
Kānaka Maoli on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaiʻi".
Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2009 In the early 2000s, the Congressional delegation of the State of Hawaiʻi introduced the
Native Hawaiian Federal Recognition Bill (Akaka bill), an attempt to
recognize and form a Native Hawaiian government entity to negotiate with state and federal governments. The bill would establish, for the first time, a formal political and legal relationship between a Native Hawaiian entity and the US government. Proponents consider the legislation to be an acknowledgement and partial correction of past injustices. They included Hawaiʻi's Congressional delegation, as well as former Governor
Linda Lingle. Opponents include the
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (who doubted the constitutionality of creating a race-based government), libertarian activists (who challenged the accuracy of claims of injustice), and other Native
Hawaiian sovereignty activists (who claimed that the legislation would prevent complete independence from the United States). A Ward Research poll commissioned in 2003 by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs reported that "Eighty-six percent of the 303 Hawaiian residents polled by Ward Research said 'yes.' Only 7 percent said 'no,' with 6 percent unsure ... Of the 301 non-Hawaiians polled, almost eight in 10 (78 percent) supported federal recognition, 16 percent opposed it, with 6 percent unsure." A
Zogby International poll commissioned in 2009 by the
Grassroot Institute of Hawaii indicated that a plurality (39%) of Hawaiʻi residents opposed it and that 76% indicated that they were unwilling to pay higher taxes to offset any resulting tax revenue loss due to the act. The bill did not pass.
Ka Huli Ao: Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law In 2005, with the support of U.S. Senator
Daniel Inouye, federal funding through the Native Hawaiian Education Act created the Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law at UH Mānoa
William S. Richardson School of Law. The program became known as Ka Huli Ao: Center for Excellence in Native Hawaiian Law. Ka Huli Ao focuses on research, scholarship, and community outreach. Ka Huli Ao maintains a social media presence and provides law students with summer fellowships. Law school graduates are eligible to apply for post-J.D. fellowships.
Department of Interior Self-Governance Proposal In 2016, the
Department of Interior (DOI), under the direction of Secretary
Sally Jewell, started the process of recognizing the Hawaiians' right to self governance and the ability for nation-to-nation negotiation status and rights. This created opposition from the Hawaiian Sovereignty movement who believed that
Kānaka Maoli should not have to navigate US structures to regain sovereignty and viewed the process as incomplete. The outcome ultimately allowed nation-to-nation relationships if
Kānaka Maoli created their own government and sought that relationship. The government formation process was stopped by Justice
Anthony Kennedy, using his earlier precedent in
Rice v. Cayetano that "ancestry was a proxy for race" in ancestry-based elections,
but the voting itself was not stopped.
Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month The United States government has permanently designated the month of May to be
Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month; before 2021 it was known as
Asian Pacific American Heritage Month.
Native Hawaiian Community Consultation Policy On October 18, 2022, the
Department of Interior published a press release announcing the establishment of a new policy that would require the federal government to formally consult the Native Hawaiian Community in order to "further affirm and honor the special political and trust relationship between the United States and the Native Hawaiian Community." Secretary
Deb Haaland noted in the press release that the new consultation policy would assist in upholding the sovereignty and right to
self-determination Native Hawai'ian communities have. In addition to bi-annual meetings between the Secretary and representatives of Native Hawaiian organizations on "matters of mutual interest", as well as mandatory training, the Consultation policy requires federal agencies to consult the Native Hawai'ian Community before engaging in any actions that "have the potential to significantly affect Native Hawaiian resources, rights, or lands by correspondingly charging the Office with fully integrating the policy and practice of meaningful consultation by such Federal agencies." Its proposal explained the unique relationship Native Hawaiian have with the US government, defined as "government-to-sovereign" and recognized in 150 statutes: the unrelinquished sovereignty Native Hawaiiana have legally in the absence of a "government-to-government" relationship.
Violence Against Women Act In December 2022, the
Violence Against Women Act was amended to include
Kānaka Maoli survivors of gender-based violence and Native Hawaiian organizations in grant funding. ==Notable
Kānaka Maoli==