Tinbergen described four questions he believed should be asked of any animal behaviour, which were: •
Causation (mechanism): what are the stimuli that elicit the response, and how has it been modified by recent
learning? How do behaviour and psyche "function" on the molecular, physiological, neuro-ethological, cognitive and social level, and what do the relations between the levels look like? (compare:
Nicolai Hartmann: "The laws about the levels of complexity") •
Development (
ontogeny): how does the behaviour change with age, and what early experiences are necessary for the behaviour to be shown? Which developmental steps (the ontogenesis follows an "inner plan")
and which environmental factors play when / which role? (compare:
Recapitulation theory) • Function (
adaptation): how does the
behaviour impact on the animal's chances of survival and reproduction? •
Evolution (
phylogeny): how does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related
species, and how might it have arisen through the process of phylogeny? Why did structural associations (behaviour can be seen as a "time space structure") evolve in this manner and not otherwise?* These have been long recognized in
Philosophy of Biology to strongly correspond with the efficient, material, formal and final causes of
Aristotelian causality, though Tinbergen does not reference Aristotle in his work. In
ethology and
sociobiology, causation and ontogeny are summarised as the "proximate mechanisms", while
adaptation and
phylogeny are the "ultimate mechanisms". They are still considered as the cornerstone of modern ethology, sociobiology and
transdisciplinarity in Human Sciences. == Supernormal stimulus ==