Boston University religion scholar
Stephen Prothero argues that non-denominationalism hides the fundamental theological and spiritual issues that initially drove the division of Christianity into denominations behind a veneer of "Christian unity". He argues that non-denominationalism encourages a descent of Christianity—and indeed, all religions—into comfortable "general moralism" rather than being a focus for facing the complexities of churchgoers' culture and spirituality. Prothero further argues that it also encourages ignorance of the Scriptures, lowering the overall
religious literacy while increasing the potential for inter-religious misunderstandings and conflict. Steven R. Harmon, a Baptist theologian who supports
ecumenism, argues that "there's really no such thing" as a non-denominational church, because "as soon as a supposedly non-denominational church has made decisions about what happens in worship, whom and how they will baptize, how and with what understanding they will celebrate
holy communion, what they will teach, who their ministers will be and how they will be ordered, or how they relate to those churches, these decisions have placed the church within the stream of a specific type of denominational tradition". Harmon argues that the cause of Christian unity is best served through denominational traditions, since each "has historical connections to the church's
catholicity ... and we make progress toward unity when the denominations share their distinctive patterns of catholicity with one another". Pauw considers denominationalism to be a "unifying and conserving force in Christianity, nurturing and carrying forward distinctive theological traditions" (such as
Wesleyanism being supported by Methodist denominations).
Ryan Burge argues that non-denominational churches are less equipped to monitor or report sexual abuse cases because they lack national organizations to do so. Because of non-denominational churches lack of organizational structure, accountability is minimal. In an article on evangelical clergy sex abuse in
The New Republic by Elle Hardy, religious studies scholar Matthew D. Taylor argues that the relative lack of accountability in non-denominational churches attract pastors "who are more megalomaniacal and authoritarian in their personality". Since non-denominational churches lack a hierarchy to answer to, pastors with authoritarian personalities are given more opportunities to exert power and control over their congregants. Non-denominational preachers claim to have oversight from their boards and mentorship from "spiritual parents", but these are usually people they know. Taylor argues, "They're incentivized to protect their friends and protect the oligarchy. They all have a stake in it, and none of them have personal incentives other than principled theological convictions to actually hold their friends accountable, so that the incentives all push in the direction of abuse and cover-up rather than in the direction of accountability and exposure." ==See also==