In a Desarguesian projective plane a
conic can be defined in several different ways that can be proved to be equivalent. In non-Desarguesian planes these proofs are no longer valid and the different definitions can give rise to non-equivalent objects. Theodore G. Ostrom had suggested the name
conicoid for these conic-like figures but did not provide a formal definition and the term does not seem to be widely used. There are several ways that conics can be defined in Desarguesian planes: • The set of absolute points of a polarity is known as a
von Staudt conic. If the plane is defined over a
field of
characteristic two, only
degenerate conics are obtained. • The set of points of intersection of corresponding lines of two pencils which are projectively, but not perspectively, related is known as a
Steiner conic. If the pencils are perspectively related, the conic is degenerate. • The set of points whose coordinates satisfy an irreducible homogeneous equation of degree two. Furthermore, in a finite Desarguesian plane: • A set of points, no three collinear in is called an
oval. If
q is odd, by
Segre's theorem, an oval in is a conic, in sense 3 above. • An
Ostrom conic is based on a generalization of harmonic sets. Artzy has given an example of a Steiner conic in a Moufang plane which is not a von Staudt conic. Garner gives an example of a von Staudt conic that is not an Ostrom conic in a finite semifield plane. == Notes ==