The long-range vision of the architects of the North American Numbering Plan was a system by which telephone subscribers in the United States and Canada could themselves dial and establish a
telephone call to any other subscriber without the assistance of
switchboard operators. While the dialing of telephone calls by subscribers was common-place in many cities across the continent for local destinations, long-distance telephone calls had to be patched through manually by telephone operators at typically multiple intermediate toll offices using a system known since 1929 as the
General Toll Switching Plan. Operator Toll Dialing required a nationwide
telephone numbering plan that unified all local numbering plans into a consistent universal system. Local numbering plans, many of which required only four or five digits to be dialed, or even fewer in small communities, needed to be expanded. The goal was to preserve existing dialing patterns of the local telephone companies as much as possible.
Numbering plan areas and central offices The new numbering plan divided the North American continent into regional service areas, termed
numbering plan areas (
NPAs). The divisions conformed primarily to the jurisdictional boundaries of the
U.S. states and the
Canadian provinces, though some states or provinces needed to be divided into multiple areas. NPAs were created in accordance with principles deemed to maximize customer understanding and minimize dialing effort, while reducing plant cost. Each NPA was identified by a unique three-digit code number, termed the
numbering plan area code (
NPA code, or short,
area code), which was prefixed to the local telephone number when calling from one NPA to another. Calling within the same numbering plan area did not require dialing the area code, a feature today termed
seven-digit dialing and today abandoned in numbering plan areas with multiple area codes. The
telephone exchanges—in the Bell System they were officially termed
central offices—became local exchange points in the nationwide system. Each of them was also assigned a three-digit number unique within its NPA. The combination of NPA code and central office code served as a destination routing code for use by operators to reach any central office through the switching network. Although the limitation to about 500 central offices per numbering plan area required the most populous states to be divided into multiple NPAs, it was not the sole reason to subdivide a state. An important aspect was the existing infrastructure for call routing, which had developed during preceding decades, often independently of state boundaries. The rules of determining areas also attempted to avoid cutting across busy toll traffic routes, so that most toll traffic remained within an NPA, and outgoing traffic in one area would not be tributary to toll offices in an adjacent area. as opposed to developments in other countries where the number of digits was not fixed. It was already common practice for decades that the digits
0 and
1 could not appear in the first two digits of the central office codes, because the system of using the first two letters of
familiar names for central offices did not assign letters to these digits. The digit
0 was used for
operator assistance, and
1, which is essentially a single pulse of loop interruption, was automatically ignored by most switching equipment of the time. The network reorganization standardized this system to using a two-letter and five-digit (
2L-5N or
2-5) representation of telephone numbers in most exchanges in North America, Originally, only eighty-six area codes were assigned.
New Jersey received the first NPA code in the new system,
area code 201, which also served the 1951 introduction of Direct Distance Dialing by customers. The second area code,
202, was assigned to the
District of Columbia. The allocation of area codes was readjusted as early as 1948 before the implementation of the plan commenced. For example, the
Indiana numbering plan area
317 was divided, which essentially provided a larger numbering pool in the Indiana suburbs of
Chicago (
area code 219). Initially, states divided into multiple numbering plan areas were assigned area codes with the digit
1 in the second position, while areas that comprised entire states or provinces received codes with
0 as the middle digit. This rule was abandoned by the early 1950s,
Dialing procedures The closed numbering plan did not require the subscriber to dial all digits. When dialing a local call or a call within the same numbering plan area, the area code was omitted in
seven-digit dialing. In some cases, even fewer digits sufficed for local calling.
Ten-digit dialing was only necessary for
foreign area calls to subscribers in another state or numbering plan area. Exceptions existed for communities on NPA boundaries, so that uniform local dialing was still possible in historically established communities.
All-number calling All-number calling was a telephone numbering plan introduced in 1958, that converted telephone numbers with exchange names to a numeric representation of seven digits. The original plan of 1947 had been projected to be usable beyond the year 2000. However, by the late 1950s it became apparent that it would be outgrown by about 1975. The limitations for the usable leading digits of central office codes, imposed by using common names for central office names, and their leading two characters as guides for customer dialing could no longer be maintained when opening new central offices. By 1962 it was forecast that in 1985 the number of telephones in the nation would equal its population of 280 million and increase to 600 million telephones for 340 million people in 2000. As a result, a few North American telephone administrations, notably New York Telephone Co., first introduced letter combinations that could not be associated with a familiar pronounceable central office name. Finally, they sought the elimination of central office names and letter codes, and introduced
all-number calling (ANC). The all-number calling plan increased the number of permissible central office prefixes from 540 to potentially 800, but the first two digits of the central office code were still restricted to the range
2 to
9, and the eight combinations that ended in
11 were reserved as special calling codes.
Interchangeable central office codes As the numbering plan grew during the 1960s using all-number calling, plan administrators at AT&T identified that by some of the largest area codes in urban centers might run out of central office prefixes to install more individual access lines. For relief in these cases, they finally eliminated the requirement that the middle digit of the central office code could not be
0 or
1. This resulted in the format of
interchangeable central office codes,
N X X, where
N=
2–9 and
X=
0–9. The first cities that required this action, in 1974, were the cities of Los Angeles with area code 213 and New York with 212. This change also required modification of the local dialing procedures to distinguish local calls from long-distance calls with area codes. Requiring
1 to be dialed before the full number in some areas provided for area codes of the form
N10, such as 210 in the
San Antonio, Texas, area and 410 in eastern
Maryland. Therefore, someone calling from
San Jose, California, to
Los Angeles before the change would have dialed 213-555-0123 and after the change 1-213-555-0123, which permitted the use of 213 as an exchange prefix in the San Jose area. The preceding
1 also ideally indicates a
toll call; however, this is inconsistent across the NANP because the FCC has left it to the
U.S. state public utilities commissions to regulate for traditional
landlines, and it has since become
moot for
mobile phones and digital
VoIP services that offer nationwide calling without the extra digit.
Interchangeable NPA codes In 1995, the North American Numbering Plan Administrator eliminated the requirement that the middle digit of an area code had to be either
0 or
1, implementing fully
interchangeable NPA and central office codes, that had already been anticipated since the 1960s, when interchangeable central office codes were sanctioned.
Modern plan The NANP numbering format is summarized in the ten-digit notation
NXX NXX-XXXX, where
N denotes any of the digits
2–
9, and
X denotes any digit
0–
9. Using 0 or 1 as the first digit of an area code or central office code is invalid; these are trunk prefixes.
9 in the middle position of the NPA is reserved for
North American Numbering Plan expansion. For example,
234 235-5678 is a valid telephone number; with area code 234, central office prefix (exchange) 235, and line number 5678. The number
234 911-5678 is invalid, because the central office code must not be in the form N11.
314 159-2653 is invalid, because the office code must not begin with
1.
123 234-5678 is invalid, because the NPA must not begin with 0 or 1. Each three-digit area code has a capacity of 7,919,900 telephone numbers (7,918,900 in the United States). Despite widespread use as
fictional telephone numbers in the form
NXX 555-XXXX, only line numbers
0100 through
0199 are reserved for this purpose, while
1212 and
4334 are the only assigned uses for directory assistance and other functions. The
country code for all countries participating in the NANP is
1. The prefix digit
1 is also used within the NANP for long-distance dialing.
Telephone number formatting NANP telephone numbers are formally rendered as
NPA-NXX-XXXX, but
(NPA) NXX-XXXX is common, as are others forms of punctuation. The parentheses were used originally to indicate that the area code was not necessary for local dialing. The
NPA-part of the number has the formal format NXX, since 1995 identical to the format of central office codes. The Government of Canada's
Translation Bureau also recommends using hyphens between groups; e.g. 250-555-0199. Under the international formatting rules for telephone numbers, per recommendation
E.164 by the
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a NANP number is rendered as
+1NPANXXXXXX, without spaces or punctuation, e.g.,
+12505550199. The
plus sign indicates that the country code follows immediately and that the user may have to dial another prefix per the dialing conventions in the country of origin. This selects international network access. The NANP prescribes the prefix
011 for the purpose of dialing destination outside the NANP. == Non-geographic services ==