The CWUAA approved the Northern 8 proposal in principle at their winter football meetings February 2, 2015. The RSEQ requested that the applicants reconsider their bid for 2016 after a vote at their winter meetings in January. The OUA has stated in media reports that they have rejected the proposal. OUA CEO Gord Grace told TSN, "It's impossible. We've already approved our schedule. We have to get on with things." The OUA did not invite the Northern 8 group to make a presentation at their winter football meetings. The AUS has stated that they would direct all efforts toward a CIS Football task force which was formed in February 2015 to address issues associated with the management of the game.
Football Canada, the governing body for the sport in Canada approved the plan in March 2015, although their decision does not have a direct impact on the execution of the proposal. There was national media coverage of the proposal across the country. Opinion columns on the proposal were generally favourable. Morris Dalla Costa of the
London Free Press wrote; "The pressure will mount on those in the OUA who are resisting. It will increase because the interlocking idea is a good one and is needed to give university football in this country at least a chance of garnering more interest and profile.An interlocking schedule would be accompanied by nationally televised games, games that a private sponsor has already committed to paying for. How’s that not a good thing?" == Second attempt (2016–2017) ==