Notocladonia was introduced by Samuel Hammer in 2003 to resolve long-standing uncertainty over the placement of certain Australasian species that had been sitting uneasily in the mainly
Neotropical genus
Ramalea. In his revision, Hammer placed the
endemic Ramalea cochleata into the new genus as
Notocladonia cochleata and described a second Australasian species,
N. undulata;
N. cochleata was designated the
type species. His treatment followed a nineteenth- and twentieth-century debate about whether
Ramalea belonged within the
Cladoniaceae at all, a debate that various authors addressed with differing conclusions. Hammer argued that
Ramalea in the strict sense (
sensu stricto) is distinct from
Notocladonia and should be excluded from the Cladoniaceae. The key practical difference he drew is where and how the spore-bearing discs (
apothecia) develop: in
Notocladonia they form at the tips of the squamules or short podetia (like other Cladoniaceae) whereas in
Ramalea the apothecia occur beneath the lichenised squamules and mature into a peculiar flattened, "butterfly-like" shape. To stabilise usage of
Ramalea, he also designated a
lectotype for its type species,
R. tribulosa. In discussing relationships within the family, Hammer noted
morphological and chemical affinities between
Notocladonia and the Australasian genus
Cladia (e.g., similar branching and
divaricatic acid chemistry), and suggested that such patterns point to a Southern Hemisphere focus of diversity in the Cladoniaceae. The name itself reflects this geography:
noto- from Greek for "southern". A five-locus phylogeny of Cladoniaceae places
Notocladonia (sampled as
N. cochleata) in a
clade with
Thysanothecium within an expanded
Cladia lineage. To resolve
paraphyly in
Cladia sensu lato (in the broad sense), the study segregated
Pulchrocladia and
Rexiella from
Cladia, while retaining
Notocladonia and
Thysanothecium as separate genera based on their contrasting morphology (presence of a squamulose primary thallus and true podetia). In a single-marker SSU analysis the exact placement of
Notocladonia was equivocal, but concatenated analyses resolved it within Cladoniaceae. ==Description==