There are several advantages relative to conventional NTR designs. As the peak
neutron flux and fission reaction rates would occur outside the vehicle, these activities could be much more vigorous than they could be if it was necessary to house them in a vessel (which would have temperature limits due to materials constraints). The fission reaction in an NSWR is dynamic, and because the reaction products are exhausted into space, it does not have a limit on the proportion of fission fuel that reacts. In many ways, NSWRs combine the advantages of fission reactors and fission bombs. One design would generate 13 meganewtons of thrust at 66 km/s exhaust velocity (6,730 seconds ISP), compared to about 4.5 km/s (450 seconds ISP) exhaust velocity for the
best chemical rockets as of February 2023. The design and calculations discussed above are using 20%-enriched
uranium salts. However, it would be plausible to use another design which could achieve much higher exhaust velocities (4,725 km/s) and use a 30,000-tonne ice comet along with 7,500 tonnes of
highly enriched uranium salts to propel a 300-tonne spacecraft up to 7.62% of the speed of light and potentially arrive at Alpha Centauri after a 60-year journey. ==Limitations==