. A common mechanism is illustrated in the animation to the right. This shows nucleation of a new phase (shown in red) in an existing phase (white). In the existing phase microscopic fluctuations of the red phase appear and decay continuously, until an unusually large fluctuation of the new red phase is so large it is more favourable for it to grow than to shrink back to nothing. This nucleus of the red phase then grows and converts the system to this phase. The standard theory that describes this behaviour for the nucleation of a new thermodynamic phase is called
classical nucleation theory. However, the CNT fails in describing experimental results of vapour to liquid nucleation even for model substances like argon by several orders of magnitude. For nucleation of a new thermodynamic phase, such as the formation of ice in water below 0°C, if the system is not evolving with time and nucleation occurs in one step, then the probability that nucleation has
not occurred should undergo
exponential decay. This is seen for example in the nucleation of ice in
supercooled small water droplets. The decay rate of the exponential gives the nucleation rate.
Classical nucleation theory is a widely used approximate theory for estimating these rates, and how they vary with variables such as temperature. It correctly predicts that the time you have to wait for nucleation decreases extremely rapidly when
supersaturated. Energy consuming self-organising systems such as the
microtubules in cells also show
nucleation and growth.
Heterogeneous nucleation often dominates homogeneous nucleation the nucleus surface makes with the solid horizontal surface decreases from left to right. The surface area of the nucleus decreases as the contact angle decreases. This geometrical effect reduces the barrier in
classical nucleation theory and hence results in faster nucleation on surfaces with smaller contact angles. Also, if instead of the surface being flat it curves towards fluid, then this also reduces the interfacial area and so the nucleation barrier. Heterogeneous nucleation, nucleation with the nucleus at a surface, is much more common than homogeneous nucleation. For homogeneous nucleation the nucleus is approximated by a sphere, but as we can see in the schematic of macroscopic droplets to the right, droplets on surfaces are not complete spheres and so the area of the interface between the droplet and the surrounding fluid is less than a sphere's 4\pi r^2 . This reduction in surface area of the nucleus reduces the height of the barrier to nucleation and so speeds nucleation up exponentially. Nucleation can also start at the surface of a liquid. For example, computer simulations of
gold nanoparticles show that the crystal phase sometimes nucleates at the liquid-gold surface.
Computer simulation studies of simple models Classical nucleation theory makes a number of assumptions, for example it treats a microscopic nucleus as if it is a macroscopic droplet with a well-defined surface whose free energy is estimated using an equilibrium property: the interfacial tension σ. For a nucleus that may be only of order ten molecules across it is not always clear that we can treat something so small as a volume plus a surface. Also nucleation is an inherently out of
thermodynamic equilibrium phenomenon so it is not always obvious that its rate can be estimated using equilibrium properties. However, modern computers are powerful enough to calculate essentially exact nucleation rates for simple models. These have been compared with the classical theory, for example for the case of nucleation of the crystal phase in the model of hard spheres. This is a model of perfectly hard spheres in thermal motion, and is a simple model of some
colloids. For the crystallization of hard spheres the classical theory is a very reasonable approximate theory. So for the simple models we can study, classical nucleation theory works quite well, but we do not know if it works equally well for (say) complex molecules crystallising out of solution.
Spinodal region Phase-transition processes can also be explained in terms of
spinodal decomposition, where phase separation is delayed until the system enters the unstable region where a small perturbation in composition leads to a decrease in energy and, thus, spontaneous growth of the perturbation. This region of a phase diagram is known as the spinodal region and the phase separation process is known as spinodal decomposition and may be governed by the
Cahn–Hilliard equation. ==Nucleation of crystals==