The following aspects of nutrient density measures have been criticized.
Measuring in proportion to energy content If nutrient density is measured in proportion to the food's energy content: • By design, it premiers
micronutrients over
macronutrients, since most macronutrients contribute to
food energy content (and thereby decrease the density measure). • A food product with excellent micronutrient content may get a very low nutrient density, if it also has significant energy content, even if that energy is provided by healthy macronutrients like
essential amino acids,
unsaturated fats and slow
carbohydrates. • A food product with very low energy content may get a very high density, even if its actual micronutrient content is low. • Focusing on low-energy food may create or trigger already existing
eating disorders.
Using a single measure for multiple nutrients No natural food product contains all
essential nutrients and nutrient density will not tell you which ones are missing. So even a diet based on a lot of high-density products could still lack several essential nutrients.
Choice of nutrients included in the measure • If all essential nutrient or micronutrients are included in the measure, it will remove focus from the nutrients that are most often lacking in people's diets. • If a selection of nutrients is made (e.g. based on how often they are lacking in people's diets), the selection will not be relevant to everyone, because some people lack completely different nutrients. ==See also==