The painting was an immediate success at the Salon. E. de Sault wrote in the
Temps of Moreau's "devotion to the old masters, and the knowledge and application of sound principles and traditions. The painter of
Oedipus, obscure and unknown yesterday, and who will be famous tomorrow". It rescued what was otherwise seen as a mediocre show, with one critic commenting, "Mr. Gustave Moreau is the hero of this Exhibition and the grumblers proclaim that if the Salon of 1864 is retrieved from discredit, it is thanks to
Oedipus and the Sphinx". Critics of the 1860s identified Moreau as an artist who reshaped the very scope of history painting. Between 1860 and 1869, his Salon submissions demonstrated a departure from the dominant theatrical mode: rather than presenting dramatic interaction among figures, he pursued what has been described as "contemplative immobility." His mythological protagonists, frozen and allegorised, resisted conventional narrative clarity. By reviving allegory—already considered obsolete—he produced works that critics found enigmatic, opening history painting to the ambiguity and layered resonance of the symbol. The work has been interpreted as Moreau's most forceful response to the mid-nineteenth-century debate between idealism and materialism in French art. Critics at the Salon hailed the painting as uniting "thought and execution," surpassing Ingres by revealing "the symbol hidden behind the fable." For Moreau, the sphinx embodied matter, sensuality, and destruction—the femme fatale whose allure threatened masculine reason—while Oedipus represented moral strength and ascetic self-mastery. Moreau transformed the scene into one of emotional proximity and physical intimacy, reimagining the traditionally fearsome creature as a figure expressing desperation and need, shown in close contact with an unusually composed Oedipus. Rather than depicting the hero as threatened or challenged, Moreau presents him as remarkably nonchalant, maintaining an almost leisurely pose even with evidence of the sphinx's deadly nature surrounding them. The humanization of the sphinx is particularly striking—she displays refined, almost noble features and decorative elements that highlight her feminine aspects over her mythological monstrosity. This deliberate distance from the realism of his contemporaries positioned Moreau as an artist who preferred to inhabit a world of legend, myth, and symbol, seeking in them a "priestly solemnity." His figures were sometimes judged as stiff or stylised, yet admirers praised the splendour of his colour, the gemlike intensity of his surfaces, and the enchanted outlook that animated his mythological subjects. Poets and critics such as Renan and Huysmans admired his imagination, recognising in him a visionary who rejected material reality in favour of inner truth.
Oedipus and the Sphinx can thus be read as part of the broader nineteenth-century yearning for "dream countries of romance and legend" that inspired the Gothic revival, the Pre-Raphaelites, and other movements. The primary criticism levelled at the work concerned its artistic influences. Critic
Paul de Saint-Victor warned that Moreau should extricate himself from the "harsh embrace" of Mantegna in order to realise his full potential,
Maxime du Camp, however, felt that it more resembled
Vittore Carpaccio's
St. George and the Dragon (1502), which Moreau had copied in Venice and which also contains the gory remains of conflict. After the Salon, Moreau quickly gained a reputation for eccentricity. One commentator said Moreau's work was "like a pastiche of Mantegna created by a German student who relaxes from his painting by reading
Schopenhauer". ==History==