Box office Burnt Offerings was regarded as a
box-office flop, grossing $1.56 million at the
box office against its $2 million budget.
Critical response The New York Times declared the film an "outstanding terror movie... an excursion into eeriness led with admirable though not perfect assurance by the director, Dan Curtis."
The Arizona Republic critic Mike Petryni was frightened by the film, particularly the smiling chauffeur, but felt it was ruined by an emphasis on constant thrills over subtle horror. He also was confused about several concepts, such as why Marian was depicted as frequently handling Roz Allardyce's trays. Ron Cowan of the
Statesman Journal described the film as a "less than
Grand Guignol venture" with a "stellar cast," concluding: "The house is a real charmer... especially when it sheds its shingles and siding and neatly disposes of troublesome people. By then, though, the movie's pace may have disposed of some of the audience." Ted Mahar of
The Oregonian likened the film to
The Innocents (1961) and praised its mood and suspense, as well as the "skillful" performance of Black, adding that Davis's portrayal is "aptly subdued." While calling Burgess Meredith and Eileen Heckart the best performers in the film,
Richard Dyer of
The Boston Globe argued the material gave the actors little to work with; he called Black "particularly inconsistent", Reed "looking like an eggplant", and stated Davis "tries to create a Bette Davis character without any Bette Davis lines to work with, so all she can do is puff and snort a lot".
Kevin Thomas of the
Los Angeles Times similarly gave the film an unfavorable review, writing that it is "too trite, too drawn-out and repetitious, too poorly motivated and finally too vague in the nature of its supernatural evil to make it." Film critic
Roger Ebert called the film "a mystery, all right", concluding "
Burnt Offerings just persists, until it occurs to us that the characters are the only ones in the theater who don't know what's going to happen next."
Variety stated "The horror is expressed through sudden murderous impulses felt by Black and Reed, a premise which might have been interesting if director Dan Curtis hadn't relied strictly on formula treatment." Donald Guarisco of
Movie Guide called the film "worthy of rediscovery by the horror fans who missed it the first time", concluding "In the end,
Burnt Offerings is probably a bit too methodical in its pacing for viewers accustomed to slam-bang approach of post-'70s horror fare but seasoned horror fans will find plenty to enjoy..." In addition to the slow build,
Starbursts Robert Martin spotlighted its cast, particularly the chemistry between Reed and
Lee Montgomery, Black's "loving and murderous" combination, and Davis' "uncomfortable" heart attack scene. However, he also felt the overall product was held back by its TV film look, particularly its "flat cinematography" and visuals that were more "clever" than scary.
Accolades == Themes and analysis ==