The
Supreme Court of the United States decided the appeal in
Olympic Airways v. Husain. Before the case reached the Supreme Court, the lower courts had decided as follows: The District Court found petitioner liable for Dr. Hanson's death, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that, under the definition in [
Air France v. Saks, ] of "accident," the flight attendant's refusal to re-seat Dr. Hanson was clearly external to him, and unexpected and unusual in light of industry standards, Olympic policy, and the simple nature of the requested accommodation. On initial appeal, a three-judge panel of the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously affirmed the finding of the District Court that Leptourgou's actions not only met the definition of "accident" under Article 17 of the
Warsaw Convention, but also rose to the level of being "wilful misconduct" under Article 25; by passing that threshold, it removed a $75,000 cap on damages. ==Question before the Court==