Eric Kaufmann characterizes the authoring of open letters in academia calling for the dismissal of academics as a form of "hard authoritarianism" accompanying
political correctness and
cancel culture. Others associate open letters with bullying, divisiveness,
safetyism (suppressing ideas to ensure a reader's immediate emotional comfort), and a culture of complaining. Open letters tend not to
win hearts and minds, especially if there is a limited connection between the writers, the subject, and the nominal addressee. A close connection, such as university faculty writing to the university president about their hopes and goals for university students, is more likely to be effective at influencing a decision than an absent or distant connection, such as students writing to the internet at large about the students' beliefs about a political situation in a country that most of the students have never visited. Signatories may feel pressured to sign an open letter written by someone else instead of writing their own. Even if the letter is badly written or does not fully or accurately reflect each signer's own views, to refuse to endorse it may be taken as complete disagreement with the general concept. In other cases, the signer may not fully understand the contents. ==Examples==