The first signs of the increasing popularity of building and sharing robot designs were found with the
maker culture community. What began with small competitions for remote operated vehicles (e.g.
Robot combat), soon developed to the building of
autonomous telepresence robots such as
Sparky and then true robots (being able to take decisions themselves) as the Open Automaton Project. Several commercial companies now also produce kits for making simple robots. The community has adopted
open source hardware licenses, certifications, and peer-reviewed publications, which check that source has been made correctly and permanently available under community definitions, and which validate that this has been done. These processes have become critically important due to many historical projects claiming to be open source but them reverting on the promise due to commercialisation or other pressures. As with other forms of
open source hardware, the community continues to debate precise criteria for 'ease of build'. A common standard is that designs should be buildable by a technical university student, in a few days, using typical
fablab tools, but definitions of all of these subterms can also be debated. Compared to other forms of
open source hardware, open source robotics typically includes a large software element, so involves software as well as hardware engineers. Open source concepts are more established in
open source software than hardware, so robotics is a field in which those concepts can be shared and transferred from software to hardware. While the community in open source robotics is multi-faceted with a wide range of backgrounds, a sizable sub-community uses the
ROS middleware and meets at the ROSCon conferences to discuss development of ROS itself and automation components built on it. ==References==