In 1979
Western Isles MP
Donald Stewart, aware of rumours about the trial, questioned
Defence Secretary Francis Pym about them in Parliament. Pym gave reassurances that "they did not impinge in any way on the general public". The
Observer's report about this incorrect statement commented that there was no reason to think that he had any idea of the truth. the then-
Secretary of State for Defence,
Malcolm Rifkind, to commission an independent report on Operations Cauldron and Hesperus in 1952 and 1953, and all similar chemical weapons tests
about which the public reasonably seek reassurance. An initial Commons question by him to the
Ministry Of Defence was referred to the director-general of the
Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment at
Porton Down,
Wiltshire. In his letter, Dr Pearson said:
The papers on Operations Cauldron and Hesperus are classified, and it would not be in the national interest to make these available as the information therein could be misused by states seeking to acquire a biological weapons capability. The pathogens used were as follows: (a) Operation Cauldron: the pathogens that cause brucellosis and plague. (b) Operation Hesperus: the pathogens that cause brucellosis and tularaemia. Dr Pearson added:
The safety aspects of handling, transport and packaging were all carefully addressed to ensure there was no danger to any of those engaged in the trial.
There is no cause to believe that there was any hazard to the public or the environment and there is no evidence to the contrary. Mr MacDonald responded at the time saying:
This reply is deeply unsatisfactory and does not provide any of the reassurances which I and my constituents seek about the tests. He continued to outline his belief that it was not satisfactory that the same Government organisation which carried out
potentially highly dangerous experiments should be allowed to pass the final judgment on itself regarding the health implications both then and subsequently. ==Ruling against the MOD==