History The first recognition of an herbivorous group of dinosaurs was named Orthopoda in
1866 by
Edward Drinker Cope, a name that is now recognized as a synonym of Ornithischia. Discussions on the taxonomy of dinosaurs by
Othniel Charles Marsh identified two major groups of herbivorous dinosaurs,
Ornithopoda and
Stegosauria, containing genera from a broad geographic and stratigraphic distribution. While often these groups were placed within Dinosauria,
Harry Govier Seeley suggested instead in
1888 that ornithopods and stegosaurs, which shared many features in the skull, limbs, and hip, were unrelated to other dinosaurs, and so he proposed that Dinosauria was an unnatural grouping of two independently-evolved
suborders,
Saurischia and Ornithischia. It is from the anatomy of the hip that Seeley chose the name Ornithischia, referencing the bird-like anatomy of the
ischium bone. Many researchers did not follow the division of Seeley at first, with Marsh naming the group Predentata to unite ornithopods, stegosaurs, and
Ceratopsia within Dinosauria, but with additional work and new discoveries the unnatural nature of Dinosauria came to be accepted, and the names Seeley proposed found common use. After further decades, in
1974 Robert T. Bakker and
Peter M. Galton provided new evidence in support of the grouping of ornithischians and saurischians together within a natural Dinosauria, which has been supported since. The first cladistic studies on Ornithischia were published simultaneously in
1984 by
David B. Norman, Andrew R. Milner, and
Paul C. Sereno. These studies differed somewhat in their results, but found that
Iguanodon was closer to
hadrosaurs than other ornithopods, followed by
Dryosaurus,
Hypsilophodon and then
Lesothosaurus and its relatives. While the study of Norman placed ceratopsians between
Hypsilophodon and more derived ornithopods, the study of Sereno placed ceratopsians with ankylosaurs and stegosaurs. It has since been recognized by that ceratopsians are closer to ornithopods than the armoured ankylosaurs and stegosaurs, but the relationships of some groups are still in states of change, with some more consistent results than others. An early study that looked at the relationships within Ornithischia with greater detail was that of Sereno in
1986, who provided features that supported the evolution of all ornithischian groups and shared similarities with earlier studies. Sereno found that
Lesothosaurus was the most primitive ornithischian, with all other ornithischians united within the clade Genasauria, which has two subgroups. The first subgroup,
Thyreophora, unites ankylosaurs and stegosaurs along with more primitive taxa like
Scelidosaurus, while the second subgroup,
Cerapoda, contained ornithopods, ceratopsians, pachycephalosaurs, and small primitive forms. One group of the small primitive forms considered to be cerapodans by Sereno,
Heterodontosauridae, has since been found to be a group of very early ornithischians of similar evolutionary status as
Lesothosaurus, although this result is not definitive. The first large-scale numerical analysis of the phylogenetics of Ornithischia was published in
2008 by
Richard J. Butler and colleagues, including many primitive ornithischians and members from all of the major subgroups, to test some of the hypotheses given previously about ornithischian evolution and the relationships of the groups. Thyreophora was found to be a supported group, as well as the clade of pachycephalosaurs and ceratopsians that Sereno named
Marginocephalia in 1986. Some taxa considered earlier to be ornithopods, like heterodontosaurids,
Agilisaurus,
Hexinlusaurus and
Othnielia, were instead found to be outside of both Ornithopoda and Ceratopsia, but still closer to those two groups than thyreophorans. The early Argentinian taxon
Pisanosaurus was found to be the most primitive ornithischian, but while overall results agreed with earlier studies and showed some stability, areas of the evolutionary tree were found to be problematic, and with potential for later change. In
2021, a new phylogenetic study was published authored by Paul-Emile Dieudonné and colleagues that instead found Heterodontosauridae to nest alongside Pachycephalosauria within Marginocephalia, changing the early evolution of ornithopods considerably, and showing that the evolution of ornithischians was far from definitive. Below are the cladograms of Sereno, Butler and colleagues, and Dieudonné and colleagues, restricted to the major clades of Ornithischia, Heterodontosauridae,
Lesothosaurus and
Pisanosaurus.
Sereno, 1986 }}
Butler et al., 2008 }}
Dieudonné et al., 2021 }}
Subgroups When Ornithischia was first named, Seeley united the orders Ornithopoda and Stegosauria of Marsh's taxonomy within the new group.
Ceratopsia was then recognized as a unique group related to ornithopods and stegosaurs by Marsh by 1894, with each of the three suborders still being recognized as distinct groups today. Ceratopsians are recognized as group that grew in diversity later in the
Cretaceous after evolving in the
Late Jurassic, encompassing a diverse array of bodyforms from the small, bipedal
Psittacosaurus up to the very large, quadrupedal, horned and frilled
ceratopsids like
Torosaurus, which has the longest skull of any terrestrial vertebrate. Ornithopods, which range from the Early Jurassic in some studies until the end of the Cretaceous with continuous diversity, are generally bipedal and unarmoured, though some later groups like
Hadrosauridae evolved complex dental anatomy in the form of batteries of teeth. Stegosaurs are comparatively limited, restricted to a primarily Jurassic group of moderate to large, quadrupedal herbivores with two rows of vertical plates ornamenting their spine, which possibly did not go extinct until the Late Cretaceous, though at the time of Marsh Stegosauria was used for all armored and quadrupedal taxa, many of which are now separated into
Ankylosauria. Ankylosaurs were only recognized as a distinct group from stegosaurs in the 1920s despite many members being known for decades before, with the group now encompassing a broad array of heavy, quadrupedal ornithischians with extensive armour covering their body and skull. The fifth recognized major subgroup of ornithischians is
Pachycephalosauria, which was first named in
1974 after being confused for a long time with the theropod
Troodon on account of their similarly omnivorous and unique teeth. Pachycephalosaurians are unique for their tall, thickened skulls and small, bipedal bauplan, suggesting that their domes were for sexual display or combat in the form of head-butting or flank-butting. Some taxa, particularly those at one point grouped together in the ornithopod family
Hypsilophodontidae, are now recognized to not fall within any of the major ornithischian groups, and either be outside Genasauria, or on the basal stem of Neornithischia outside Cerapoda. Following the publication of the
PhyloCode to provide rules and regulations on the use of taxonomic names for groups, the internal classification of Ornithischia was revised by Daniel Madzia and colleagues in 2021 to provide a framework of definitions and taxa for other studies to follow and modify from. They names the new clade Saphornithischia to unite heterodontosaurids with more derived ornithischians to encompass the concept of the well-supported clear ornithischians, as the origins of the group and the relationships of primitive taxa like
Pisanosaurus and members of
Silesauridae may sometimes be found to be ornithischians outside this core grouping. Madzia and colleagues also provided a composite cladogram of Ornithischia to illustrate the consensus of internal divisions, which can be seen below. Ornithischia has been defined as all taxa closer to
Iguanodon than
Allosaurus or
Camarasaurus. Genasauria has been defined as the smallest clade containing
Ankylosaurus,
Iguanodon,
Stegosaurus, and
Triceratops. }} Multiple taxa within Ornithischia fall around the origin of the group, or cannot be classified definitively.
Lesothosaurus and
Laquintasaura have been found as basal thyreophorans or basal ornithischians,
Chilesaurus is either a theropod or a basal ornithischian,
Pisanosaurus has been found as a basal ornithischian or a non-ornithischian silesaurid,
Eocursor has been a basal ornithischian or a basal member of Neornithischia,
Serendipaceratops cannot be classified beyond Ornithischia as it is either an ankylosaur or a ceratopsian, and
Alocodon,
Fabrosaurus,
Ferganocephale,
Gongbusaurus,
Taveirosaurus,
Trimucrodon and
Xiaosaurus are dubious ornithischians of uncertain basal classification. Depending on the phylogenetic results,
Silesauridae could either be a clade within Ornithischia, its members could form an evolutionary gradient, or some members found form a clade while others are part of a gradient.
Evolution '', a genus originally considered an early ornithischian based on its teeth For a long time, the only understanding of the origins of Ornithischia came from
Lesothosaurus and
Pisanosaurus, which together represented the best-known
Early Jurassic and
Triassic ornithischians respectively. Many suggestions of taxa and specimens that could be referred to Ornithischia from the Triassic were based on teeth and jaw bones, as they showed similar adaptations for herbivory. The genera
Revueltosaurus,
Galtonia,
Pekinosaurus,
Tecovasaurus,
Lucianosaurus,
Protecovasaurus,
Crosbysaurus, and
Azendohsaurus were all at one time considered to be Triassic ornithischians with only their teeth known, but are now recognized to be completely unrelated. The only early ornithischians that were considered to be diagnostic in a 2004 review by Norman and colleagues were
Lesothosaurus,
Pisanosaurus and
Technosaurus, limiting the early ornithischian record to only two Triassic genera from
Argentina and the United States and one Early Jurassic genus from
South Africa, with all the tooth taxa being considered undiagnostic. Referrals of isolated teeth to Ornithischia based on herbivorous features began to be extensively questioned by William G. Parker and colleagues in
2005 after the discovery of skull and skeleton material clearly from
Revueltosaurus showing that the "ornithischian-like" teeth were from an animal more closely related to
crocodiles than
birds, and there were multiple occurrences of herbivory throughout Triassic reptiles. Removing the list of Triassic tooth taxa from Ornithischia, the early diversity of the group was substantially reduced, especially in comparison to the known Triassic diversity of theropods and sauropodomorphs. If
Pisanosaurus represented the earliest ornithischian, there would be at least a 20 million year gap in the evolution of Ornithischia until
Lesothosaurus and heterodontosaurids. It is possible that the limited early record of ornithischians is due to them inhabiting environments that were less conducive to fossilization, or that the phylogenetics of the group were incorrect and that early ornithischians were already known but identified as members of other groups. }} }} }} }} }} First noted in the
2003 naming of the early taxon
Silesaurus, some taxa generally considered non-dinosaurs show similarities to ornithischians in the teeth and jaw anatomy. These basal taxa, which were then grouped within
Silesauridae and commonly as the sister group to Dinosauria, may instead be the earliest ornithischians. They show adaptations for the evolution of herbivory, and can fill in the gap in early evolution of ornithischians that were otherwise only clearly known since the beginning of the
Jurassic. This hypothesis has found support in multiple different phylogenetic analyses, but the results are not yet accepted as definitive enough to contradict other possible evolutionary strategies of dinosaurs. Alternatively, and more in line with earlier studies on dinosaur evolution, silesaurids may be the sister taxa to the Saurischia-Ornithischia split, or even other arrangements of the three main dinosaur groups Ornithischia,
Sauropodomorpha, and
Theropoda. The
2017 phylogenetic study of Matthew G. Baron and colleagues suggested that instead of a Saurischia-Ornithischia split, ornithischians were instead closest to theropods in the clade
Ornithoscelida, with sauropodomorphs being outside the grouping. Under this case, the omnivory in the earliest sauropodomorphs and ornithischians would be the ancestral condition for dinosaurs, along with the grasping abilities seen in the earliest ornithischians and theropods. While Ornithoscelida is a possible hypothesis for the evolution of dinosaurs and the close relationships of Ornithischia, follow-up studies have not found it statistically more likely than the traditional dichotomy of Ornithischia and Saurischia, or the third alternative,
Phytodinosauria, where ornithischians and sauropodomorphs are closer to each other than theropods. Along with
Pisanosaurus, which was supported as the earliest ornithischian for a time before being considered just as likely to be a silesaur rather than an ornithischian, an additional problematic taxon is
Chilesaurus from the Late Jurassic of
Chile. While it was originally named as a derived theropod with unique anatomy, it was found in studies based on Baron and colleagues results to instead be either the basalmost ornithischian, or a sauropodomorph. As the earliest ornithischian,
Chilesaurus tied multiple details of ornithischian and theropod anatomy together supporting their union in Ornithoscelida, though when it is not the basalmost ornithischian, a traditional Saurischia is recovered. The problematic nature of
Chilesaurus requires further revisiting of its anatomy, but the details of vertebral air pockets, pelvis shape, and hand support it as a theropod.
Daemonosaurus, typically a theropod or close relative of
herrerasaurs, has also been found as the basalmost ornithischian at times when Ornithoscelida is recovered, but it does not share any unique features with ornithischians and redescribing its anatomy found it fairly confidently to be a basal dinosaur not related closely to Ornithischia. The phylogenetic analysis of Norman and colleagues in
2022 recovered the members of Silesauridae as forming an ancestral grade within Ornithischia even with the inclusion of
Chilesaurus, supporting the earlier results of Müller and Garcia and their evolutionary trends for early ornithischian anatomy. Norman and colleagues used Prionodontia over both Saphornithischia and Genasauria, since all were recovered as encompassing the same node. The earliest ornithischians under this reconstruction were faunivorous, as seen by
Lewisuchus, which has typical teeth like theropods. Serrations on teeth become larger for taxa more derived than
Asilisaurus, the development of a
cingulum in teeth is seen in
Technosaurus and later ornithischians, the lower jaw becomes more elongate in taxa above
Silesaurus, and core ornithischians are united by the
pubic bone angling backwards, and the modification of the ankle joint.
, Asilisaurus, Eucoelophysis, Technosaurus, Sacisaurus, Silesaurus, Diodorus scytobrachion and Soumyasaurus'' }} == Palaeoecology ==