International Former US co-chair of the Minsk Group
Richard E. Hoagland, reflecting on his work with the Minsk Group, wrote that "very, very little ever got accomplished" by the group. He suggested that the Minsk Group redefine its mission, e.g. by enabling reconstruction to its approved mandate, otherwise it may continue as "an intriguing backwater of international diplomacy". According to
Carey Cavanaugh, another former US co-chair of the Minsk Group, the organization's consensus-based decision-making process and its rotating leadership rendered it "structurally flawed" to act as a peacemaker, and the
United Nations would have been a better option to facilitate peace. For analyst Laurence Broers, the Minsk Group's future remains unclear, with its failure caused by factors like the normative ambiguity of its attempts to balance the countervailing principles of self-determination and territorial integrity; its secretive, narrow and top-down
modus operandi; and its default to performative over substantive diplomacy since 2011, when occasional summits in far-away capitals with little or no interaction in between made the peace process alien to Armenian and Azerbaijani societies. Broers considers the Minsk Group to be "an artifact of the post-Cold War unipolar world" in the settings of growing multipolar world.
In Azerbaijan In Azerbaijan, the OSCE Minsk Group is unpopular due to the presence of large
Armenian diasporas in its three co-chair countries and the strategic alliance between Russia and Armenia, which has raised questions about the group’s impartiality. Criticism of the group’s inefficiency began during
Heydar Aliyev’s era and continued under his son and successor, Ilham Aliyev. During the
2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, France received particularly harsh criticism in Azerbaijan, to the point of being viewed as "unworthy" to hold the position of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair. == Dissolution ==