Racist ruling in Griffin v. Brady
In 1909, Dugro gained national attention for his decision in a case involving George W. Griffin, an
African-American Pullman porter. On a train headed to
Montreal, a railroad executive named Daniel N. Brady (a brother of
Diamond Jim Brady) accused Griffin of stealing his wallet. Griffin was pulled off the train and detained for hours before being released for lack of evidence. Griffin then sued Brady in Dugro's New York court for false arrest and imprisonment. A jury found in Griffin's favor and awarded him $2,500 in damages (). Dugro said that the amount was excessive and ordered it reduced to $300 because of Griffin's race — that a black man's reputation was not as harmed by a false accusation as a white man's: The ruling spurred outrage among African Americans nationwide, who called it "perhaps the most infamous opinion in a Northern court of law during the present generation" and Dugro a "20th century Judge Taney," after
Roger Taney, author of the notorious
Dred Scott decision. Griffin appealed the ruling three times, seeking restoration of the $2,500 judgment, but he was denied each time; however, the final appeal, in an opinion written by
Edward Everett McCall, resulted in the damages being raised to $1,000. Two later legal scholars called the case "perhaps the most celebrated instance of racial devaluation in early-20th-century tort litigation." The writer and activist
James Weldon Johnson wrote of Dugro: == Death ==