In 2002, the Pacific
Surimi unit of the company pleaded no contest to charges of theft stemming from a practice of consistently exaggerating the "weigh back" amount, which is the portion of each catch deemed unsuitable for processing. They paid out $800,000 in damages to the aggrieved parties. In 2010,
fishermen in Oregon filed an
antitrust class action lawsuit against Pacific, alleging that the company used unethical tactics based on their share of the market to drive down payouts to fishermen in
Oregon,
Washington, and
California. Some fishermen compared Pacific's effect on the market to the
Wal-Mart Effect in retail sales. In March 2023, a commercial crab fisherman named Brand Little filed a class-action
price-fixing lawsuit against Pacific, alleging that he and 1,400 other crabbers in California, Oregon, and Washington were forced to accept lower prices for crab due to
anticompetitive behavior by Pacific involving a "multipronged strategy of monopsonization, coercion, dumping, and secret deals." In May 2023, Pacific filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In May 2024, U.S. Magistrate Court Judge Alex G. Tse granted Pacific's motion to dismiss the case, ruling that Little had not sufficiently proven his claims, but giving Little the opportunity to amend most of his claims by 20 August 2024. ==References==