The subject of this work has not necessarily been regarded as Athena and has been the subject of debate. In the early 20th century, Andrey Ivanovich Somov identified it as
Pallas Athena, The
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum in
Glasgow has a very similar work on the same subject,
Man in Armour, but records show that Ruffo was not satisfied with the first work, and it is known that Rembrandt sent another work on the same subject, which is thought to be one of these two. Furthermore,
ancient Greek coins often bore the images of Alexander and Athena on their obverse and reverse sides, respectively. Consequently, since the
Renaissance period, the two figures have been confused, giving rise to depictions of Alexander in the guise of Athena. this work belonged to a private collection in
Paris in 1780, which negates the theory that it is at least a painting by Ruffo. Other evidence that the figure is Athena includes the helmet adorned with an owl and the shield bearing the head of Medusa. An engraving of Pallas Athena that appeared in the 1659 wedding parade of
Henriette Catharina of Nassau and
John George II, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau, is similar to this work in terms of pose and costume. This goddess was portrayed by Rembrandt's son,
Titus van Rijn, which has led to the hypothesis that Rembrandt painted this work based on Titus' appearance in the parade. Titus may have posed as a model. A recent hypothesis suggests that this painting was part of a trilogy, alongside the
Louvre's
Venus en Amour (1660s) and the
Hammer Museum's
Juno (early 1660s). The view is that the three works were probably commissioned from Rembrandt by the art dealer Herman Becker (c. 1617–1678). ==Attribution==