Over the centuries, especially since European colonization, Pampas deer have been harvested in their millions. In the 1860s, documents for the
Port of Buenos Aires indicate that some two million Pampas deer pelts were sent to Europe during the decade, alone. Many years later, as infrastructure was being built throughout the pampas, roads and automobiles made hunting even easier. The deer were also killed for food, medicinal purposes, and purely for sport. As of 2003, there are fewer than 2,000 Pampas deer in Argentina and Uruguay. Both countries have declared the species to be a "natural monument" and yet the hunting continues, albeit somewhat less frequently. The decline of the Pampas deer has been likened to that of the once-plentiful
bison of
North America, as the deer were once far greater in number, and held a similar place in the survival and spirituality of the native peoples of the region, including the
Guaraní. The deer were revered; not only were they hunted, their carcasses blessed, and spirits thanked for their sacrifice, but the entire animal would be utilized for food, building materials, weapons, clothing, medicine, and more. Historically, the native peoples of northern Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay participated in the sale of Pampas deer pelts for export, and yet the animals persevered until European powers ultimately took over. The settlers brought with them mass
agricultural expansion and uncontrolled, unregulated hunting of wildlife, as well as new, lethal pathogens with the arrival of domesticated
livestock. Escaped farm animals formed feral populations, thus competing with the Pampas deer and other local species for resources, in addition to exposing them to potential new diseases. Some landowners have set aside areas of their properties as undisturbed or native habitat for the deer, as well as keeping cattle instead of sheep or goats; sheep and goats compete more directly with the deer as they also browse on shrubbery and tall vegetation, far more than the grazing cattle. The landowners that choose cattle are doing it as a service, however, as sheep are far more lucrative to raise than cattle. Conservationists encourage this trend, sharing research that more edible vegetation is available on ranches with cattle and deer during times of drought than on ranches with cattle and sheep. ==References==