Birth and names Veronese took his usual name from his birthplace of
Verona, then the largest possession of Venice on the mainland. The census in Verona attests that Veronese was born sometime in 1528 to a
stonecutter, or
spezapreda in the
Venetian language, named Gabriele, and his wife Caterina. He was their fifth child. It was common for surnames to be taken from a father's profession, and thus Veronese was known as Paolo Spezapreda. He later changed his name to Paolo Caliari, because his mother was the illegitimate daughter of a nobleman called Antonio Caliari. His earliest known painting is signed "P. Caliari F., "the first known instance in which he used this surname", and after using "Paolo Veronese" for several years in Venice, after about 1575 he resumed signing his paintings as "Paolo Caliari".
Youth '', ,
National Gallery By 1541, Veronese was apprenticed with
Antonio Badile, who was later to become his father-in-law, and in 1544 was an apprentice of
Giovanni Francesco Caroto; both were leading painters in Verona. Although trained in the culture of
Mannerism then popular in
Parma, he soon developed his own preference for a more radiant palette. In his late teens he painted works for important churches in Verona, and in 1551 he was commissioned by the Venetian branch of the important
Giustiniani family to paint the altarpiece for their chapel in the church of
San Francesco della Vigna, which was then being entirely rebuilt to the design of
Jacopo Sansovino. In the same year he worked on the decoration of the Villa Soranzo near
Treviso, with his fellow Veronese
Giovanni Battista Zelotti and
Anselmo Canneri; only fragments of the frescos remain, but they seem to have been important in establishing his reputation. The description by
Carlo Ridolfi nearly a century later mentions that one of the mythological subjects was
The Family of Darius before Alexander, the rare subject in Veronese's grandest treatment of secular history, now in the
National Gallery, London. In 1552 Cardinal
Ercole Gonzaga, great-uncle of the ruling
Guglielmo Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua, commissioned an altarpiece,
Temptation of St. Anthony for
Mantua Cathedral (now at the
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Caen in
Caen, France), which Veronese painted
in situ. He doubtless used his time in
Mantua to study the ceilings by
Giulio Romano; it was as a painter of ceiling frescos that he would initially make his mark in Venice, where he based himself permanently from the following year.
Venice (1556–57) Veronese moved to Venice in 1553 after obtaining his first state commission, ceilings in fresco decorating the
Sala dei Consiglio dei Dieci (the Hall of the
Council of Ten) and the adjoining
Sala dei Tre Capi del Consiglio in the
Doge's Palace, in the new rooms replacing those lost in the fire of 1547. His panel of
Jupiter Hurling Thunderbolts at the Vices for the former is now in the
Louvre. He then painted a
History of Esther on the ceiling for the church of
San Sebastiano (1556–57). It was these ceiling paintings and those of 1557 in the
Marciana Library (for which he was awarded a prize judged by Titian and Sansovino) that established him as a master among his Venetian contemporaries. Already these works indicate Veronese's mastery in reflecting both the subtle foreshortening of the figures of
Correggio and the heroism of those by
Michelangelo.
Villa Barbaro and refectory paintings By 1556, Veronese was commissioned to paint the first of his monumental banquet scenes, the
Feast in the House of Simon, which would not be concluded until 1570. Owing to its scattered composition and lack of focus, however, it was not his most successful refectory mural. In the late 1550s, during a break in his work for San Sebastiano, Veronese decorated the
Villa Barbaro in
Maser, a newly finished building by the architect
Andrea Palladio. The frescoes were designed to unite humanistic culture with Christian spirituality; wall paintings included portraits of the
Barbaro family, and the ceilings opened to blue skies and mythological figures. Veronese's decorations employed complex perspective and ''
trompe-l'œil'', and resulted in a luminescent and inspired visual poetry. The encounter between architect and artist was a triumph. '', 1562–1563,
Louvre The
Wedding at Cana, painted in 1562–1563, was also a collaboration with Palladio. It was commissioned by the
Benedictine monks for the
San Giorgio Maggiore Monastery, on the eponymous small island across from Saint Mark's, in Venice. The contract insisted on the huge size (to cover 66 square meters), and that the pigment and colors should be of premium quality. For example, the contract specified that the blues should contain the precious mineral
lapis-lazuli. The contract also specified that the painting should include as many figures as possible. There are a number of portraits (including those of Titian and Tintoretto, as well as a self-portrait of Veronese) staged upon a canvas surface nearly ten meters wide. The scene, taken from the New Testament
Book of John, II, 1–11, represents the first miracle performed by Jesus, the making of wine from water, at a marriage in
Cana,
Galilee. The foreground celebration, a frieze of figures painted in the most shimmering finery, is flanked by two sets of stairs leading back to a terrace, Roman
colonnades, and a brilliant sky. Veronese arranged the architecture to run mostly parallel to the picture plane, accentuating the processional character of the composition. The artist's decorative genius was to recognize that dramatic perspectival effects would have been tiresome in a living room or chapel, and that the narrative of the picture could best be absorbed as a colorful diversion. These paintings offer little in the representation of emotion; rather, they illustrate the carefully composed movement of their subjects along a primarily horizontal axis. Most of all they are about the incandescence of light and color. The exaltation of such visual effects may have been a reflection of the artist's personal well-being, for in 1565 Veronese married Elena Badile, the daughter of his first master, and by whom he would eventually have a daughter and four sons. Artistically,
The Feast in the House of Levi indicates Veronese's technical development in using intense and luminous colors for texture, attention to narrative coherence, the acute representation of human emotion, and the psychologically subtle interplay occurring among the characters who crowd the scene. '' (1573) featured people and animals that the Inquisition perceived as heretical. The Inquisitors'
investigation found no heresy, yet ordered Paolo Veronese to re-title the painting something other than
The Last Supper, the original title. Given the subject of the painting, the biblical
Last Supper, the
humanistic depictions of the characters lacked the piousness usual to
Roman Catholic art depicting the Christ character and the events of his life; and the
Inquisition readily noticed Veronese's irreligiosity. By the 1570s, the theology of the
Counter-Reformation had given legal authority to Roman Catholic doctrine in Venice, which was a new, political development for an artist such as Veronese. In the
Venetian republic of the Late–Renaissance, for an artist, painting crowd scenes had acquired political ramifications regarding who and what appeared in a religious painting commissioned from him, regardless of the patron or patroness. A decade earlier, the Benedictine monks who commissioned
The Wedding at Cana (1563) had directed Veronese to freely include as many human figures as would fit in the banquet scene. In contrast, a decade later, Veronese encountered legal, religious constraints that determined the suitability (theological, political, sociological) of who and what he depicted in a painting—thus, on 18 July 1573, Veronese was summoned before the
Venetian Holy Inquisition to explain the presence of what Church doctrine considered characters, animals, and indecorum extraneous to an image of the
Last Supper of the Christ. The tribunal's interrogation of Veronese was cautionary, rather than punitive; political, rather than judicial; nonetheless, Veronese explained to the Inquisitiors that "we painters take the same liberties as poets and madmen" in telling a story. Although the Inquisition's tribunal ordered Veronese to repaint the last-supper scene, he opposed their remedy to his theological offences, yet was compelled to re-title the painting from the sacramental
The Last Supper to
The Feast in the House of Levi. That an artist, such as Veronese, had successfully perdured against the Inquisition's implied accusation of
heresy, indicated he had the discreet political support of a
patrician patron of the arts. ==Assessment==