Diagram, description, and definitions The diagram represents a
cone with its axis . The point A is its
apex. An inclined
cross-section of the cone, shown in pink, is inclined from the axis by the same angle , as the side of the cone. According to the definition of a parabola as a conic section, the boundary of this pink cross-section EPD is a parabola. A cross-section perpendicular to the axis of the cone passes through the vertex P of the parabola. This cross-section is circular, but appears
elliptical when viewed obliquely, as is shown in the diagram. Its centre is V, and is a diameter. We will call its radius . Another perpendicular to the axis, circular cross-section of the cone is farther from the apex A than the one just described. It has a
chord , which joins the points where the parabola
intersects the circle. Another chord is the
perpendicular bisector of and is consequently a diameter of the circle. These two chords and the parabola's axis of symmetry all intersect at the point M. All the labelled points, except D and E, are
coplanar. They are in the plane of symmetry of the whole figure. This includes the point F, which is not mentioned above. It is defined and discussed below, in . Let us call the length of and of , and the length of .
Derivation of quadratic equation The lengths of and are: Using the
intersecting chords theorem on the chords and , we get \overline\mathrm{BM} \cdot \overline\mathrm{CM} = \overline\mathrm{DM} \cdot \overline\mathrm{EM}. Substituting: 4ry\cos\theta = x^2. Rearranging: y = \frac{x^2}{4r\cos\theta}. For any given cone and parabola, and are constants, but and are variables that depend on the arbitrary height at which the horizontal cross-section BECD is made. This last equation shows the relationship between these variables. They can be interpreted as
Cartesian coordinates of the points D and E, in a system in the pink plane with P as its origin. Since is squared in the equation, the fact that D and E are on opposite sides of the axis is unimportant. If the horizontal cross-section moves up or down, toward or away from the apex of the cone, D and E move along the parabola, always maintaining the relationship between and shown in the equation. The parabolic curve is therefore the
locus of points where the equation is satisfied, which makes it a
Cartesian graph of the quadratic function in the equation.
Focal length It is proved in a
preceding section that if a parabola has its vertex at the origin, and if it opens in the positive direction, then its equation is , where is its focal length. Comparing this with the last equation above shows that the focal length of the parabola in the cone is .
Position of the focus In the diagram above, the point V is the
foot of the perpendicular from the vertex of the parabola to the axis of the cone.
The point F is the foot of the perpendicular from the point V to the plane of the parabola. By symmetry, F is on the axis of symmetry of the parabola. Angle VPF is
complementary to , and angle PVF is complementary to angle VPF, therefore angle PVF is . Since the length of is , the distance of F from the vertex of the parabola is . It is shown above that this distance equals the focal length of the parabola, which is the distance from the vertex to the focus. The focus and the point F are therefore equally distant from the vertex, along the same line, which implies that they are the same point. Therefore,
the point F, defined above, is the focus of the parabola. This discussion started from the definition of a parabola as a conic section, but it has now led to a description as a graph of a quadratic function. This shows that these two descriptions are equivalent. They both define curves of exactly the same shape.
Alternative proof with Dandelin spheres An alternative proof can be done using
Dandelin spheres. It works without calculation and uses elementary geometric considerations only (see the derivation below). The intersection of an upright cone by a plane \pi, whose inclination from vertical is the same as a
generatrix (a.k.a. generator line, a line containing the apex and a point on the cone surface) m_0 of the cone, is a parabola (red curve in the diagram). This generatrix m_0 is the only generatrix of the cone that is parallel to plane \pi. Otherwise, if there are two generatrices parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be a
hyperbola (or
degenerate hyperbola, if the two generatrices are in the intersecting plane). If there is no generatrix parallel to the intersecting plane, the intersection curve will be an
ellipse or a
circle (or
a point). Let plane \sigma be the plane that contains the vertical axis of the cone and line m_0. The inclination of plane \pi from vertical is the same as line m_0 means that, viewing from the side (that is, the plane \pi is perpendicular to plane \sigma), m_0 \parallel \pi. In order to prove the directrix property of a parabola (see above), one uses a
Dandelin sphere d, which is a sphere that touches the cone along a circle c and plane \pi at point F. The plane containing the circle c intersects with plane \pi at line l. There is a
mirror symmetry in the system consisting of plane \pi, Dandelin sphere d and the cone (the
plane of symmetry is \sigma). Since the plane containing the circle c is perpendicular to plane \sigma, and \pi \perp \sigma, their intersection line l must also be perpendicular to plane \sigma. Since line m_0 is in plane \sigma, l \perp m_0. It turns out that F is the
focus of the parabola, and l is the
directrix of the parabola. • Let P be an arbitrary point of the intersection curve. • The
generatrix of the cone containing P intersects circle c at point A. • The line segments \overline{PF} and \overline{PA} are tangential to the sphere d, and hence are of equal length. • Generatrix m_0 intersects the circle c at point D. The line segments \overline{ZD} and \overline{ZA} are tangential to the sphere d, and hence are of equal length. • Let line q be the line parallel to m_0 and passing through point P. Since m_0 \parallel \pi, and point P is in plane \pi, line q must be in plane \pi. Since m_0 \perp l, we know that q \perp l as well. • Let point B be
the foot of the perpendicular from point P to line l, that is, \overline{PB} is a segment of line q, and hence \overline{PB} \parallel \overline{ZD}. • From
intercept theorem and \overline{ZD} = \overline {ZA} we know that \overline{PA} = \overline {PB}. Since \overline{PA} = \overline {PF}, we know that \overline{PF} = \overline {PB}, which means that the distance from P to the focus F is equal to the distance from P to the directrix l. == Proof of the reflective property ==