One reviewer stated that 'If
Philip K. Dick was reading
Kafka, got freaked out and wrote
The Matrix, which was then directed by
Stanley Kubrick, you might end up with something like this'. Phil Davies-Brown stated that the 'film is such an accomplished piece of work with rich texture, amazing use of location, lighting and camera and fine performances from some of the genre's most respected talents'. Commenting on the performances of individual cast members, Davies-Brown stated that
Jeremy Sisto 'was his usual weird self but it worked a treat', that '
Bruce Payne was intimidating', that
Udo Kier was 'hilarious', that
Deborah Kara Unger was 'mysterious' and that
Lance Henriksen 'turned in his best performance in a long while'. Ryan Cracknell commented that 'while the story is very original combining the techno-edge of
The Matrix with
Orson Welles’
The Trial, it's the mood and atmosphere where the filmmakers really shine'. Ultimo Franco gave the film a score of 3 out of 5, commented that 'the film looks beautiful' and stated that 'fans of
Guillermo del Toro and
David Fincher should find a lot to appreciate here'. The film was given a score of 9 out of 10 on the website Cyberpunkreview.com, which stated that the film 'has perhaps the most biting commentary on advertising and software development you will find anywhere'. Andrea Ballerini stated that 'the movie has all the classic ingredients of the cyberpunk genre: a dystopian environment, powerful corporations trying to rule the citizens, the role of technology in the development of society, the pros and cons of progress'. Hildur Loftsdóttir gave the film three stars out of five, noted the influence of
David Cronenberg and
David Lynch and stated that the story was 'both original and well thought out'. Rainer Heinz described the film as a 'Kafkaesk-morbid thriller with effectively interwoven set pieces from films like
Blade Runner,
Matrix,
Cube and
Delicatessen and a fascinating colour and image aesthetic'. He also stated that the film was 'a gripping and dark science fiction thriller, which achieves its effect not least from brilliant image design'. Simon Hyslop described the film as 'a treat for anyone with an appreciation for the quieter, artier manifestations of the sci-fi genre'. A reviewer for
TV Guide stated that 'sci-fi drama and paranoid thrills drive this smart and highly original chiller'. A Hungarian reviewer stated that the film contained a 'large dose of social criticism disguised as a thriller'. Scott Foundas was more critical of the film, stating that it 'frantically stitches together images and ideas lifted from
George Orwell,
The Matrix and films by
David Cronenberg, only to end up with a haphazard
Frankenstein monster of a movie'. Brian McKay was also critical of the film, stating that 'the plot and character development are about as thin as the atmosphere on
Pluto'. Erik Childress stated that the 'film is very much like
Soylent Green...as our protagonist wades through a creepy and dank futuristic setting before being hit over the head with a staggering realization' but that 'like the
Charlton Heston cult classic, there's a lot of atmosphere to engulf an audience but it becomes tiresome, only to get really interesting again in the final scenes'. In 2007, the film was listed as one of the “Top 50 Dystopian Movies of All Time” by
Snarkerati, a popular movie web-magazine. Kelvin Polowy stated that 'like
The Matrix, the film plays on corporate and technological paranoia, and it's a stylish if not ground breaking entry into the subgenre'. In an academic appraisal of the film, Angelos Koutsourakis stated that 'the film's representational solution to the complexity of
surveillance capitalism draws on the
Marxist understanding of capital as vampiric dead labor that feeds on the workers bodies and brains during their labor time; but here the dead labor of capital is pictured consuming individuals even during their leisure time and this coincides with
Zuboff’s argument that...surveillance capitalism feeds on every aspect of every human's experience'. ==References==