William Shakespeare is alluded to often, and his works are quoted by one count at least 95 times in the three Parnassus plays. He is explicitly mentioned by name in the last two plays. At almost every turn he is satirized or mocked, which is to be expected in a satire, especially when the target of the satire has become very successful and well known. The Parnassus plays are seen, at least in part, as extending the war of words that had been occurring between the university men and those who were not part of that group. The university men would include Cambridge alumni
Thomas Nashe and
Robert Greene, who both had attacked Shakespeare in print: Nashe in his pamphlet,
Pierce Penniless, and Greene in ''
Greene's Groats-Worth of Wit. Shakespeare had replied in turn with some mockery of Nashe in his play Love's Labour's Lost''. Shakespeare and his theatre company were on tour probably in 1601 and visited Oxford and Cambridge, sometime between the performances of parts two and three of the trilogy. This is indicated on the title-page of the first quarto of
Hamlet (1603), where the play is said to have been acted "in the two Universities." Just such a troupe of low-born actors is described in
The Return to Parnassus; the Scourge of Simony, as they might be seen from the point-of-view of competitive and envious young scholars: England affords those glorious vagabonds That carried earst their fardels on their backes, Coursers to ride on through the gazing streetes, Sooping it in their glaring Satten sutes, And Pages to attend their Maisterships: With mouthing words that better wits have framed, They purchase lands, and now Esquiers are namde. A tone of bitter mockery is established as Philomusus and Studiosus, out of desperation, audition for the professional stage, and are judged by
Richard Burbage and
Will Kemp, two important members of Shakespeare's company, the
Lord Chamberlain's Men. Burbage and Kemp find humor in the deficiencies of scholars not only as actors but also as dramatists: KEMPE: The slaves are somewhat proud, and besides it is a good sport in a part to see them never speak in their walk, but at the end of the stage, just as though in walking with a fellow we should never speak but at a stile, a gate, or a ditch, where a man can go no further…. BURBAGE: A little teaching will mend these faults, and it may be besides they will be able to pen a part. KEMPE: Few of the University [men] plaies well, they smell too much of that writer Ovid, and that writer Metamorphosis, and talk too much of Proserpina and Jupiter. Why heres our fellow Shakespeare puts them all downe, I and Ben Jonson too. O that Ben Jonson is a pestilent fellow, he brought up Horace giving the poets a pill, but our fellow Shakespeare hath given him a purge that made him bewray his credit. This well-known passage is bitterly ironic: The author of the Parnassus plays is holding up to scorn – for an academic audience – the opinions of two illiterate fools, Burbage and Kempe, who think that
Metamorphosis is a writer, and that their colleague, Shakespeare, puts the university playwrights to shame. The audition piece Philomusus is asked to perform is taken from the opening monologue of Shakespeare's play,
Richard III: "Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York." In this part of the trilogy, Shakespeare is seen as a poet, and also as a dramatist and actor. In the second play,
The Return from Parnasus, the character named Gullio, who is lovesick and a fool, is mocked for his worshipful devotion to "pure Shakspeare and shreds of poetry that he hath gathered at the theaters." When Gullio later cries out, "O sweet Mr. Shakspeare! I'll have his picture in my study at the court," it suggests that young scholars who appreciated Shakespeare's writing, also had a regard for his person. The author of the Parnassus plays has the character Judico comment on a number of poets, and he considers Shakespeare: Who loves not Adons love, or Lucrece rape? His sweeter verse contaynes hart throbbing line, Could but a graver subject him content Without loves foolish lazy languishment. Apparently he admires the language and verse in Shakespeare's early poems, but suggests that Shakespeare may have been wasting his talent by writing love poetry. This faint praise of Shakespeare the actor-poet contrasts with the greater praise he gives to Drayton, Nashe and others. ==Identifying allusions==