The known material of
Passer predomesticus consists of two
premaxillary bones in the collections of the
Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The bones were described by Israeli palaeontologist
Eitan Tchernov in 1962 Tchernov did not unambiguously identify a
type specimen and his paper was said by
Robert M. Mengel, the editor of
The Auk, to contain "many troublesome lapses and contradictions". In 1975, French palaeontologist Cécile Mourer-Chauviré reported on fossil sparrows from a cave at
Saint-Estève-Janson in southeastern France, which could not be identified as either
P. predomesticus or the
house sparrow (
Passer domesticus). Because no premaxillae were found, the bones could not be distinguished from those of the house sparrow. Tchernov argued that the house sparrow and related species have undergone considerable
morphological changes in adapting to a
commensal relationship with humans, with the beak becoming longer and narrower. He wrote that
P. predomesticus was intermediate between the house sparrow and
Spanish sparrow (
Passer hispaniolensis), and suggested that it may be a primitive relative of the ancestor of the house sparrow that did not become dependent on humans. In a 1984 paper, Tchernov suggested that the period in which the house sparrow and
P. predomesticus could have separated was the
Würm glaciation 70,000–10,000 years ago. In his 1988 work
The Sparrows, British ornithologist
J. Denis Summers-Smith considered that
P. predomesticus was roughly contemporary with the common ancestor of the house and Spanish sparrows and that all present-day
Palaearctic Passer species evolved later. Drawing on more recent studies of
molecular data, Ted R. Anderson stated in his 2006
Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow that all
Passer species have a long evolutionary history, with
speciation possibly occurring as early as the
Miocene. == Description ==