Reviews were disappointing.
Renata Adler of
The New York Times advised: "I think you ought to skip
The Wicked Dreams of Paula Schultz, because this first film of the year is so unrelievedly awful, in a number of uninteresting ways. It seems to view the
cold war as a vast conspiracy to get people undressed, as clumsily and joylessly as possible. In various scenes, Miss Sommer has her sweatshirt removed by the weight of some medals on her front, her bathrobe drawn off by a vacuum cleaner, her black-lace underthings reeled in by some fishermen on a river bank, her dress split by a climb up the wall of a hotel, and so on." Joseph Gelmis of
Newsday called it "A Big, Well-Rounded Zero": "By definition, a clean dirty movie cancels itself out. It is zero, nothing. The men keep grabbing Elke and she keeps losing her clothes but preserving her virtue. And you've got to wonder what age audience the film is aimed at. It's too raunchy for a 10-year-old boy and not sexy enough for a 40-year-old boy. The slapstick is juvenile. The script is a series of tired cliches. As for Elke Sommer, someone is going to prove before long that she's really
Doris Day with a bad chest cold."
The Independent Film Journal cautioned exhibitors, "The nearly two hours it takes to tell UA's
The Wicked Dreams of Paula Schultz is going to make it difficult to package the elongated
burlesque skit with another feature. Yet by itself the entry's chances appear slim, having to rely on the sex appeal of its star Elke Sommer, the TV following of her co-star Bob Crane, and its general low-comedy appeal. George Marshall directed this old-fashioned farce as though it were
Ladies Night in a Turkish Bath.
Dreams should do best in the less sophisticated territories where patrons may find the picture's obvious humor to their liking." The film had only a short run in theaters. ==Later references==