Political reaction Taft hoped that the act would stimulate the economy and enhance his political standing. He praised the provision empowering the president to raise rates on countries which discriminated against American products and the provision for free trade with the Philippines. Taft embarked on a speaking tour in September 1909, speaking across the country in support of the PayneAldrich Act, visiting
Boston,
Chicago,
Milwaukee, and other cities. At
Winona, Minnesota, Taft said it was "the best tariff bill the Republican Party ever passed." In particular, the increased duty on print paper led the publishing industry to viciously criticize Taft, further tarnishing his image, and the Congress. Some critics charged that Taft should have more actively pressed Congress for reductions. This split led to the party's losses in the
1910 elections and a challenge against Taft by his predecessor,
Theodore Roosevelt, in the
1912 presidential primaries. After Taft won the nomination at the
1912 Republican National Convention, Roosevelt contested
the general election on an
independent ticket and split the Republican vote, resulting in the election of
Woodrow Wilson, the Democratic nominee. During the next Congress, Wilson signed the
Revenue Act of 1913, lowering tariff rates across the board and introducing the first federal income tax. Thereafter, the United States government relied on income taxes for an increasing proportion of revenues.
Academic reactions In an article for the
Quarterly Journal of Economics,
F. W. Taussig wrote that the congressional debates about the tariffs were "depressing for the economist. There is hardly a gleam of general reasoning of the sort which is applied in our books to questions of international trade... That there should be general acceptance of the protectionist principle, and that the only question in debate should be whether duties were "unreasonably" high, was natural enough. Most people get used to existing conditions, and cannot easily conceive of anything different."
Legal challenges The corporate tax provision was challenged and affirmed by the United States Supreme Court in
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. ==References==