MarketPharmacology of ethanol
Company Profile

Pharmacology of ethanol

The pharmacology of ethanol involves both pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. In the body, ethanol primarily affects the central nervous system, acting as a depressant and causing sedation, relaxation, and decreased anxiety. The complete list of mechanisms remains an area of research, but ethanol has been shown to affect ligand-gated ion channels, particularly the GABAA receptor.

History
Beginning with the Gin Craze, excessive drinking and drunkenness developed into a major problem for public health. In 1874, Francis E. Anstie's experiments showed that the amounts of alcohol eliminated unchanged in breath, urine, sweat, and feces were negligible compared to the amount ingested, suggesting it was oxidized within the body. In 1902, Atwater and Benedict estimated that alcohol yielded 7.1 kcal of energy per gram consumed and 98% was metabolized. In 1922, Widmark published his method for analyzing the alcohol content of fingertip samples of blood. Through the 1930s, Widmark conducted numerous studies and formulated the basic principles of ethanol pharmacokinetics for forensic purposes, including the eponymous Widmark equation. In 1980, Watson et al. proposed updated equations based on total body water instead of body weight. The TBW equations have been found to be significantly more accurate due to rising levels of obesity worldwide. ==Pharmacodynamics==
Pharmacodynamics
The principal mechanism of action for ethanol has proven elusive and remains not fully understood. Identifying molecular targets for ethanol is unusually difficult, in large part due to its unique biochemical properties. Thus, there remains lingering doubt about the mechanisms of ethanol listed here, even for the GABAA receptor, the most-studied mechanism. In the past, alcohol was believed to be a non-specific pharmacological agent affecting many neurotransmitter systems in the brain, but progress has been made over the last few decades. ion channels are complex proteins, and their interactions and functions are complicated by diverse subunit compositions and regulation by conserved cellular signals (e.g. signaling lipids). The result of these direct effects is a wave of further indirect effects involving a variety of other neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems. but the role of PEth needs to be investigated further. List of known actions in the central nervous system Ethanol has been reported to possess the following actions in functional assays at varying concentrations: • GABAA receptor: positive allosteric modulator (primarily of δ subunit-containing receptors) • NMDA receptor: negative allosteric modulatorSerotonin 5-HT3 receptor: positive allosteric modulator • Opioid receptor: endogenous positive allosteric modulator • Glycine reuptake inhibitorAdenosine reuptake inhibitorL-type calcium channel: channel blockerGIRK: channel openerVoltage-gated calcium channelBK channel modulation • G-protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channelsBrain medulla: Decreased levels of nitric oxideMesolimbic pathway: Increased levels of dopamine and endogenous opioids, secondary to other actions In accordance, it was theorized and widely believed that the primary mechanism of action of ethanol is GABAA receptor positive allosteric modulation. but γ subunit receptors are enhanced only at far higher concentrations (> 100 mM) that are in excess of recreational concentrations (up to 50 mM). GABAA receptors containing the δ-subunit have been shown to be located exterior to the synapse and are involved with tonic inhibition rather than its γ-subunit counterpart, which is involved in phasic inhibition. While it has been shown by Santhakumar et al. that GABAA receptors containing the δ-subunit are sensitive to ethanol modulation, depending on subunit combinations receptors could be more or less sensitive to ethanol. It has been shown that GABAA receptors that contain both δ and β3-subunits display increased sensitivity to ethanol. Calcium channel blocking Research indicates ethanol is involved in the inhibition of L-type calcium channels. One study showed the nature of ethanol binding to L-type calcium channels is according to first-order kinetics with a Hill coefficient around 1. This indicates ethanol binds independently to the channel, expressing noncooperative binding. Vasopressin levels are reduced after the ingestion of alcohol. The lower levels of vasopressin from the consumption of alcohol have been linked to ethanol acting as an antagonist to voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs). Studies conducted by Treistman et al. in the aplysia confirm inhibition of VGCC by ethanol. Voltage clamp recordings have been done on the aplysia neuron. VGCCs were isolated and calcium current was recorded using patch clamp technique having ethanol as a treatment. Recordings were replicated at varying concentrations (0, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mM) at a voltage clamp of +30 mV. Results showed calcium current decreased as concentration of ethanol increased. Similar results have shown to be true in single-channel recordings from isolated nerve terminal of rats that ethanol does in fact block VGCCs. Studies done by Katsura et al. in 2006 on mouse cerebral cortical neurons, show the effects of prolonged ethanol exposure. Neurons were exposed to sustained ethanol concentrations of 50 mM for 3 days in vitro. Western blot and protein analysis were conducted to determine the relative amounts of VGCC subunit expression. α1C, α1D, and α2/δ1 subunits showed an increase of expression after sustained ethanol exposure. However, the β4 subunit showed a decrease. Furthermore, α1A, α1B, and α1F subunits did not alter in their relative expression. Thus, sustained ethanol exposure may participate in the development of ethanol dependence in neurons. Other experiments done by Malysz et al. have looked into ethanol effects on voltage-gated calcium channels on detrusor smooth muscle cells in guinea pigs. Perforated patch clamp technique was used having intracellular fluid inside the pipette and extracellular fluid in the bath with added 0.3% vol/vol (about 50-mM) ethanol. Ethanol decreased the current in DSM cells and induced muscle relaxation. Ethanol inhibits VGCCs and is involved in alcohol-induced relaxation of the urinary bladder. Rewarding and reinforcing actions receptor agonists The reinforcing effects of alcohol consumption are mediated by acetaldehyde generated by catalase and other oxidizing enzymes such as cytochrome P-4502E1 in the brain. Although acetaldehyde has been associated with some of the adverse and toxic effects of ethanol, it appears to play a central role in the activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Ethanol's rewarding and reinforcing (i.e., addictive) properties are mediated through its effects on dopamine neurons in the mesolimbic reward pathway, which connects the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). One of ethanol's primary effects is the allosteric inhibition of NMDA receptors and facilitation of GABAA receptors (e.g., enhanced GABAA receptor-mediated chloride flux through allosteric regulation of the receptor). At high doses, ethanol inhibits most ligand-gated ion channels and voltage-gated ion channels in neurons as well. Relationship between concentrations and effects Recreational concentrations of ethanol are typically in the range of 1 to 50 mM. In the upper range of recreational ethanol concentrations of 20 to 50 mM, depression of the central nervous system is more marked, with effects including complete drunkenness, profound sedation, amnesia, emesis, hypnosis, and eventually unconsciousness. In addition to respiratory failure and accidents caused by its effects on the central nervous system, alcohol causes significant metabolic derangements. Hypoglycaemia occurs due to ethanol's inhibition of gluconeogenesis, especially in children, and may cause lactic acidosis, ketoacidosis, and acute kidney injury. Metabolic acidosis is compounded by respiratory failure. Patients may also present with hypothermia. ==Pharmacokinetics==
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of ethanol are well characterized by the ADME acronym (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion). Besides the dose ingested, factors such as the person's total body water, speed of drinking, the drink's nutritional content, and the contents of the stomach all influence the profile of blood alcohol content (BAC) over time. Breath alcohol content (BrAC) and BAC have similar profile shapes, so most forensic pharmacokinetic calculations can be done with either. Relatively few studies directly compare BrAC and BAC within subjects and characterize the difference in pharmacokinetic parameters. Comparing arterial and venous BAC, arterial BAC is higher during the absorption phase and lower in the postabsorptive declining phase. glycerolipid metabolism, and bile acid biosynthesis pathways. Fermentation is a biochemical process during which yeast and certain bacteria convert sugars to ethanol, carbon dioxide, as well as other metabolic byproducts. The average human digestive system produces approximately 3g of ethanol per day through fermentation of its contents. Such production generally does not have any forensic significance because the ethanol is broken down before significant intoxication ensues. These trace amounts of alcohol range from 0.1 to in the blood of healthy humans, with some measurements as high as . Auto-brewery syndrome is a condition characterized by significant fermentation of ingested carbohydrates within the body. In rare cases, intoxicating quantities of ethanol may be produced, especially after eating meals. Claims of endogenous fermentation have been attempted as a defense against drunk driving charges, some of which have been successful, but the condition is under-researched. Absorption s at a festival in Hungary. Carbonated alcoholic drinks seem to be absorbed faster. Ethanol is most commonly ingested by mouth, but other routes of administration are possible, such as inhalation, enema, or by intravenous injection. The absorption rate of ethanol is typically modeled as a first-order kinetic process depending on the concentration gradient and specific membrane. The rate of absorption is fastest in the duodenum and jejunum, owing to the larger absorption surface area provided by the villi and microvilli of the small intestines. Gastric emptying is therefore an important consideration when estimating the overall rate of absorption in most scenarios; In humans, concentrations of ethanol in air above 10 mg/L caused initial coughing and smarting of the eyes and nose, which went away after adaptation. 20 mg/L was just barely tolerable. Concentrations above 30 mg/L caused continuous coughing and tears, and concentrations above 40 mg/L were described as intolerable, suffocating, and impossible to bear for even short periods. Breathing air with concentration of 15 mg/L ethanol for 3 hours resulted in BACs from 0.02 to 0.45 g/L, depending on breathing rate. It is not a particularly efficient or enjoyable method of becoming intoxicated. Applying a 70% ethanol solution to a skin area of for 1 hr would result in approximately of ethanol being absorbed. The substantially increased levels of ethanol in the blood reported for some experiments are likely due to inadvertent inhalation. Ethanol is rapidly absorbed through cut or damaged skin, with reports of ethanol intoxication and fatal poisoning. The timing of peak blood concentration varies depends on the type of alcoholic drink: • Vodka tonic: 36 ± 10 minutes after consumption • Wine: 54 ± 14 minutes • Beer: 62 ± 23 minutes Also, carbonated alcoholic drinks seem to have a shorter onset compare to flat drinks in the same volume. One theory is that carbon dioxide in the bubbles somehow speeds the flow of alcohol into the intestines. Absorption is reduced by a large meal. Stress speeds up absorption. Distribution After absorption, the alcohol goes through the portal vein to the liver, then through the hepatic veins to the heart, then the pulmonary arteries to the lungs, then the pulmonary veins to the heart again, and then enters systemic circulation. Once in systematic circulation, ethanol distributes throughout the body, diffusing passively and crossing all biological membranes including the blood–brain barrier. At equilibrium, ethanol is present in all body fluids and tissues in proportion to their water content. Ethanol does not bind to plasma proteins or other biomolecules. The rate of distribution depends on blood supply, Peak circulating levels of ethanol are usually reached within a range of 30 to 90 minutes of ingestion, with an average of 45 to 60 minutes. and has been the subject of much research. Widmark originally used units of mass (g/kg) for EBAC, thus he calculated the apparent of distribution or mass of blood in kilograms. He fitted an equation M_d=\rho_m W of the body weight in kg, finding an average rho-factor of 0.68 for men and 0.55 for women. This has units of dose per body weight (g/kg) divided by concentration (g/kg) and is therefore dimensionless. However, modern calculations use weight/volume concentrations (g/L) for EBAC, so Widmark's rho-factors must be adjusted for the density of blood, 1.055 g/mL. This \rho_v = V_d / W has units of dose per body weight (g/kg) divided by concentration (g/L blood) - calculation gives values of 0.64 L/kg for men and 0.52 L/kg for women, lower than the original. A more accurate method for calculating is to use total body water (TBW) - experiments have confirmed that alcohol distributes almost exactly in proportion to TBW within the Widmark model. TBW may be calculated using body composition analysis or estimated using anthropometric formulas based on age, height, and weight. is then given by TBW_\text{kg} / F_{\text{water}}, where F_{\text{water}} is the water content of blood, approximately 0.825 w/v for men and 0.838 w/v for women. These calculations assume Widmark's zero-order model for the effects of metabolization, and assume that TBW is almost exactly the volume of distribution of ethanol. Using a more complex model that accounts for non-linear metabolism, Norberg found that Vd was only 84-87% of TBW. This finding was not reproduced in a newer study which found volumes of distribution similar to those in the literature. At even low physiological concentrations, ethanol completely saturates alcohol dehydrogenase. If catabolism of alcohol goes all the way to completion, then there is a very exothermic event yielding some of energy. If the reaction stops part way through the metabolic pathways, which happens because acetic acid is excreted in the urine after drinking, then not nearly as much energy can be derived from alcohol, indeed, only . At the very least, the theoretical limits on energy yield are determined to be to . The first with NADH is endothermic, requiring of alcohol, or about 3 molecules of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) per molecule of ethanol. Variation Variations in genes influence alcohol metabolism and drinking behavior. Certain amino acid sequences in the enzymes used to oxidize ethanol are conserved (unchanged) going back to the last common ancestor over 3.5bya. Evidence suggests that humans evolved the ability to metabolize dietary ethanol between 7 and 21 million years ago, in a common ancestor shared with chimpanzees and gorillas but not orangutans. Gene variation in these enzymes can lead to variation in catalytic efficiency between individuals. Some individuals have less effective metabolizing enzymes of ethanol, and can experience more marked symptoms from ethanol consumption than others. However, those having acquired alcohol tolerance have a greater quantity of these enzymes, and metabolize ethanol more rapidly. Specifically, ethanol has been observed to be cleared more quickly by regular drinkers than non-drinkers. Food such as fructose can increase the rate of alcohol metabolism. The effect can vary significantly from person to person, but a 100 g dose of fructose has been shown to increase alcohol metabolism by an average of 80%. In people with proteinuria and hematuria, fructose can cause falsely high BAC readings, due to kidney-liver metabolism. First-pass metabolism During a typical drinking session, approximately 90% of the metabolism of ethanol occurs in the liver. Alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase are present at their highest concentrations (in liver mitochondria). But these enzymes are widely expressed throughout the body, such as in the stomach and small intestine. Accordingly, the fetal liver cannot metabolize ethanol or other low molecular weight xenobiotics. In fetuses, ethanol is instead metabolized at much slower rates by different enzymes from the cytochrome P-450 superfamily (CYP), in particular by CYP2E1. The low fetal rate of ethanol clearance is responsible for the important observation that the fetal compartment retains high levels of ethanol long after ethanol has been cleared from the maternal circulation by the adult ADH activity in the maternal liver. CYP2E1 expression and activity have been detected in various human fetal tissues after the onset of organogenesis (ca 50 days of gestation). Exposure to ethanol is known to promote further induction of this enzyme in fetal and adult tissues. CYP2E1 is a major contributor to the so-called Microsomal Ethanol Oxidizing System (MEOS) and its activity in fetal tissues is thought to contribute significantly to the toxicity of maternal ethanol consumption. In presence of ethanol and oxygen, CYP2E1 is known to release superoxide radicals and induce the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids to toxic aldehyde products like 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE). The concentration of alcohol in breast milk produced during lactation is closely correlated to the individual's blood alcohol content. Elimination Alcohol is removed from the bloodstream by a combination of metabolism, excretion, and evaporation. 90-98% of ingested ethanol is metabolized into carbon dioxide and water. such as SCRAM ankle bracelet or the more discreet ION Wearable. Ethanol or its metabolites may be detectable in urine for up to 96 hours (3–5 days) after ingestion. This is because typical doses of alcohol saturate the enzymes' capacity. In Widmark's model, the elimination rate from the blood, , contributes 60% of the uncertainty. Earlier studies found mean elimination rates of 15 mg/dL per hour for men and 18 mg/dL per hour for women, Explanations for the gender difference are quite varied and include liver size, secondary effects of the volume of distribution, and sex-specific hormones. A 2023 study using a more complex two-compartment model with M-M elimination kinetics, with data from 60 men and 12 women, found statistically small effects of gender on maximal elimination rate and excluded them from the final model. At concentrations below 0.15-0.20 g/L, alcohol is eliminated more slowly and the elimination rate more closely follows first-order kinetics. The overall behavior of the elimination rate is described well by Michaelis–Menten kinetics. This change in behavior was not noticed by Widmark because he could not analyze low BAC levels. The model corresponds to a single-compartment model with instantaneous absorption and zero-order kinetics for elimination. The model is most accurate when used to estimate BAC a few hours after drinking a single dose of alcohol in a fasted state, and can be within 20% CV of the true value. It is less accurate for BAC levels below 0.2 g/L (alcohol is not eliminated as quickly as predicted) and consumption with food (overestimating the peak BAC and time to return to zero). == See also ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com