Phenotypic variation is a fundamental prerequisite for
evolution by
natural selection. Not all phenotypic variation is caused by underlying heritable
genetic variation. This is because the organization of living things is 'plastic', as Darwin emphasized, or 'readily capable of change.' It is the living organism as a whole that interacts with the environment and so contributes (or not) to the next generation. Thus, natural selection affects the genetic structure of a population
indirectly via the contribution of phenotypes. Without phenotypic variation, there would be no evolution by natural selection. The interaction between genotype and phenotype has often been conceptualized without reference to living organisms, as in the following relationship: :genotype (G) + environment (E) → phenotype (P) But a genotype can only be affected by or affect the environment insofar as it is embodied in a living organism. Hence, a more nuanced version of the relationship is: :genotype (G) + organism & environment interactions (OE) → phenotype (P) Phenotypes often show much flexibility or
phenotypic plasticity in the expression of genotypes; in many organisms the phenotypes which 'express' a given genotype are very different under varying environmental conditions. The plant
Hieracium umbellatum is found growing in two different
habitats in
Sweden. One habitat is rocky, sea-side
cliffs, where the plants develop to be bushy with broad leaves and expanded
inflorescences; the other is among
sand dunes where the plants develop to lie prostrate with narrow leaves and compact inflorescences. The habitats alternate along the coast of Sweden and the habitat that seeds containing the identical genotype of
Hieracium umbellatum land in, determines the phenotype which develops. An example of random variation in
Drosophila flies is the number of
ommatidia, which may vary (randomly) between left and right eyes in a single individual as much as they do between different genotypes overall, or between
clones raised in different environments. The concept of phenotype can be extended to variations below the level of the
gene which affect an organism's fitness. For example,
silent mutations that do not change the corresponding amino acid sequence of a gene may change the frequency of
guanine-
cytosine base pairs (
GC content). The base pairs have a higher thermal stability (
melting point) than
adenine-
thymine, a property that might convey, among organisms living in high-temperature environments, a selective advantage on variants enriched in GC content.
The extended phenotype Richard Dawkins described a phenotype that included all effects that a gene has on its surroundings, including other organisms, as an extended phenotype, arguing that "An animal's behavior tends to maximize the survival of the genes 'for' that behavior, whether or not those genes happen to be in the body of the particular animal performing it." For instance, an organism such as a
beaver modifies its environment by building a
beaver dam; this can be considered an
expression of its genes, just as its
incisor teeth are—which it uses to modify its environment. Similarly, when a bird feeds a
brood parasite such as a
cuckoo, it is unwittingly extending its phenotype; and when genes in an
orchid affect
orchid bee behavior to increase pollination, or when genes in a
peacock affect the copulatory decisions of peahens, again, the phenotype is being extended. Genes are, in Dawkins's view, selected by their phenotypic effects. Other biologists broadly agree that the extended phenotype concept is relevant, but consider that its role is largely explanatory, rather than assisting in the design of experimental tests. == Genes and phenotypes ==