Kenneth Clark, the director of the
National Gallery at the time, oversaw a cleaning and restoration of the
Silver Philip in 1936, which created significant controversy. Clark employed art restorer
Helmut Ruhemann, whose work Clark described as "far more skillful and scientific [than other restorers]", to carry out the cleaning. Clark's biographer, James Stourton, described the controversy of the "cleaning wars" at the time: :"Part of the problem was that Academicians thought that an artist should run the gallery (as indeed had usually been the case), rather than an art historian, and they actually enjoyed spats. The painting that aroused their feelings was the Velázquez portrait of Philip [IV], the so-called 'Silver Philip', that had just received the attentions of Ruhemann.
The Daily Telegraph had been stirring up controversy by inviting well-known artists to voice their opinions on the subject. Critics included
Alfred Munnings,
William Nicholson, and
Frank Brangwyn, who preferred to view the Old Masters through the golden glow of discoloured varnish, and even threatened the establishment of a Society for the Protection of Old Masters. A lot of ink was spilled on the matter of whether 'glazes' or varnish had been removed from the Velázquez. Clark defended the gallery in the letters page of
The Times and
Sir William Rothenstein wrote an express approval of 'the Silver Philip'...The matter rumbled on for over a year. ==See also==