The phytochrome pigment was discovered by
Sterling Hendricks and
Harry Borthwick at the
USDA-ARS Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in
Maryland during a period from the late 1940s to the early 1960s. Using a
spectrograph built from borrowed and war-surplus parts, they discovered that red light was very effective for promoting germination or triggering flowering responses. The red light responses were reversible by far-red light, indicating the presence of a photoreversible pigment. The phytochrome pigment was identified using a
spectrophotometer in 1959 by biophysicist
Warren Butler and biochemist
Harold Siegelman. Butler was also responsible for the name, phytochrome. In 1983 the laboratories of Peter Quail and Clark Lagarias reported the chemical purification of the intact phytochrome molecule, and in 1985 the first phytochrome
gene sequence was published by Howard Hershey and Peter Quail. By 1989, molecular genetics and work with
monoclonal antibodies that more than one type of phytochrome existed; for example, the
pea plant was shown to have at least two phytochrome types (then called type I (found predominantly in dark-grown seedlings) and type II (predominant in green plants)). It is now known by
genome sequencing that
Arabidopsis has five phytochrome genes (PHYA - E) but that rice has only three (PHYA - C). While this probably represents the condition in several di- and monocotyledonous plants, many plants are
polyploid. Hence
maize, for example, has six phytochromes - phyA1, phyA2, phyB1, phyB2, phyC1 and phyC2. While all these phytochromes have significantly different protein components, they all use phytochromobilin as their light-absorbing chromophore. Phytochrome A or phyA is rapidly degraded in the Pfr form - much more so than the other members of the family. In the late 1980s, the Vierstra lab showed that phyA is degraded by the ubiquitin system, the first natural target of the system to be identified in eukaryotes. In 1996 David Kehoe and Arthur Grossman at the Carnegie Institution at Stanford University identified the proteins, in the filamentous
cyanobacterium Fremyella diplosiphon called RcaE with similarly to plant phytochrome that controlled a red-green photoreversible response called chromatic acclimation and identified a gene in the sequenced, published genome of the
cyanobacterium Synechocystis with closer similarity to those of plant phytochrome. This was the first evidence of phytochromes outside the plant kingdom. Jon Hughes in Berlin and Clark Lagarias at UC Davis subsequently showed that this Synechocystis gene indeed encoded a
bona fide phytochrome (named Cph1) in the sense that it is a red/far-red reversible chromoprotein. Presumably plant phytochromes are derived from an ancestral cyanobacterial phytochrome, perhaps by gene migration from the
chloroplast to the nucleus. Subsequently, phytochromes have been found in other
prokaryotes including
Deinococcus radiodurans and
Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In
Deinococcus phytochrome regulates the production of light-protective pigments, however in
Synechocystis and
Agrobacterium the biological function of these pigments is still unknown. In 2005, the Vierstra and Forest labs at the
University of Wisconsin published a three-dimensional structure of a truncated
Deinococcus phytochrome (PAS/GAF domains). This paper revealed that the protein chain forms a knot - a highly unusual structure for a protein. In 2008, two groups around Essen and Hughes in Germany and Yang and Moffat in the US published the three-dimensional structures of the entire photosensory domain. One structures was for the
Synechocystis sp. (strain PCC 6803) phytochrome in Pr and the other one for the
Pseudomonas aeruginosa phytochrome in the Pfr state. The structures showed that a conserved part of the PHY domain, the so-called PHY tongue, adopts different folds. In 2014 it was confirmed by Takala et al that the refolding occurs even for the same phytochrome (from
Deinococcus) as a function of illumination conditions. == Genetic engineering ==