Former Schoenberg student
Lou Harrison said, "One of the major joys ... is in the structure of the
phrases. You know when you are hearing a
theme, a building or answering phrase, a
development or a
coda. There is no swerving from the
form-building nature of these classical phrases. The pleasure to be had from listening to them is the same that one has from hearing the large forms of
Mozart. ... This is a feeling too seldom communicated in
contemporary music, in much of which the most obvious formal considerations are not evident at all. ... The nature of his knowledge in this respect, perhaps more than anything else, places him in the position of torch-bearer to tradition in the vital and developing sense". The concerto has been compared with the music of
Johannes Brahms by
Mitsuko Uchida, Sabine Feisst and
AllMusic.
Aimard described the sections as follows: • "very Viennese," containing a "waltz" • full of, "anxious fragmentation," and the "sort of free Expressionist gestures that fueled his middle period" • "very expressive, sombre and tragic," "slow," containing a "Funeral March" • "very ironic and very varied in terms of character"
Stravinsky has criticized the piano writing in the concerto. Mitsuko Uchida, describing the work as very difficult for the pianist, points out that Schoenberg did not play the piano very well and that he "had no intention of writing effectively, or comfortably" for the instrument. ==References==