A Pierpont prime with is of the form 2^u+1, and is therefore a
Fermat prime (unless ). If is
positive then must also be positive (because 3^v+1 would be an
even number greater than 2 and therefore not prime), and therefore the non-Fermat Pierpont primes all have the form , when is a positive integer (except for 2, when ). Empirically, the Pierpont primes do not seem to be particularly rare or sparsely distributed; there are 42 Pierpont primes less than 106, 65 less than 109, 157 less than 1020, and 795 less than 10100. There are few restrictions from algebraic factorisations on the Pierpont primes, so there are no requirements like the
Mersenne prime condition that the exponent must be prime. Thus, it is expected that among -digit numbers of the correct form 2^u\cdot3^v+1, the fraction of these that are prime should be proportional to , a similar proportion as the proportion of prime numbers among all -digit numbers. As there are \Theta(n^{2}) numbers of the correct form in this range, there should be \Theta(n) Pierpont primes.
Andrew M. Gleason made this reasoning explicit,
conjecturing there are infinitely many Pierpont primes, and more specifically that there should be approximately Pierpont primes up to . According to Gleason's conjecture there are \Theta(\log N) Pierpont primes smaller than
N, as opposed to the smaller conjectural number O(\log \log N) of Mersenne primes in that range. ==Primality testing==