Police officers,
prosecutors,
prison guards,
judges, in the
United States criminalize, or assign criminality or deviance, to Chicano and Latino men and women based on certain appearances. Once incarcerated, other
prisoners do this as well. Chicano men endure this criminalization at a heightened rate and are "the largest segment of the diverse U.S. Latino prison population conflated into the U.S. Department of Justice term 'Hispanic.'" Chicano
tatuajes or
body tattooing, which are distinguished by their own unique style and iconography, become a marker of Chicano criminality for the
pinto subject, as argued by scholar B. V. Olguín, who embrace their oppositional status through the act rather than become "model inmates." Chicano tattooing in prison or
tatuteando, reflect the
colonized yet
oppositional (non-
assimilationist) condition of the Chicano people in the United States, argues Olguín, who are systematically criminalized, arrested, incarcerated, and then exploited for labor whether that be in the textile or agricultural industries, or for any other purpose the state deems necessary, such as "
dog boys," in which the
Texas Department of Corrections used "prisoners to mimic an escape in order to be hunted down by prison
bloodhounds and mounted guards as a training exercise for the killer dogs and entertainment for the guards and their guests."
Tatuteando are illegal in prison and are penalized by police, "as they do all forms of 'destruction of
state property'," since prisoners are viewed as state property. In his own experience as a
pinto,
raúlrsalinas notes that people who were caught engaging in
tatuteando or if they had materials necessary to tattoo on them, were given a month in
solitary confinement. This risk that pintos are willing to take, especially as the tattoos they receive are permanent markers of their transgressions within prison, illustrate their defiance to the prison industrial complex. As such, scholar B. V. Olguín states that "
tatuajes represent a victory, a testament to the survival of the
human spirit, that begins with a crime! As such, they unmask the
hegemonic and
inhumane function of
jurisprudence." In an interview, Salinas summarizes the act:Well clearly it's an act of defiance. First of all, it's illegal - 'How dare you break the rules!' It's made criminal. But to defy rules is to recognize that you are engaged in a psychological battle with the prison authorities, the guards. Similar to the intellectual's declaration that 'you can jail my body but you can't jail my mind,' the act of tattooing oneself, or soliciting an artist to tattoo you, is an act of defiance that declares: You can jail my body, but you can't control it; you can put me in solitary as punishment, but you can't take my tattoos away from me.' So it is an affront; it's a threat to the very notion of confinement, of detention. The designs that are created in these conditions, under insurmountable odds, threaten the whole system of incarceration because it shows ultimately that there are still ways to retain one's dignity. == Art and literature ==