Platyhystrix's relationship within and amongst the Dissorophidae family has been highly contested since its discovery and description. Carroll and DeMar spent the 1960s attempting to explain the relationships amongst the wide variety of genera within the family, and while their phylogenies depicted differing conclusions, they had reached a general consensus when it came to the basal versus advanced groupings. Carroll's logic (based on vertebral armor evolution) placed
P. rugosus at a more basal position amongst Permian dissorophids, with the closest sister taxon being
Aspidosaurus of the late Pennsylvanian. In 2012, Schoch produced the most comprehensive dissorophid temnospondyl phylogeny to date, analyzing 25 taxa and 70 characters in total. The result of this analysis placed
Platyhystrix and
Aspidosaurus as successive sister taxa of all other dissorophids.
Platyhystrix was separated from
Aspidosaurus using two
osteoderm characters, and this placement additionally agrees with the stratigraphy of fossil discovery. More recently, new phylogenetic analyses have been produced in order to better understand the evolution of modern day lissamphibians, due to the increasing consensus that their monophyletic group is derived from Temnospondyli. In 2019, Atkins, Reisz, and Maddin used characters relating to braincase simplification over time to construct a new phylogeny of lissamphibian origin. Based on the characters used in parsimony analysis,
Platyhystrix was noted as having a much more basal position relative to Schoch's findings, as a sister taxon to the
Olsoniformes clade. Cladogram produced by Schoch (2012): ==References==