Ben Pleasants of the
Los Angeles Times noted that "'''Popism: The Warhol '60s'' is not a book about turbulence in America, or upheaval in our cities or even experimentation in the arts; instead, it focuses on the chic gossip of the art crowd of Manhattan during that era." David Dawson of the
Gannett News Service wrote: "He does not deeply analyze himself or his movement, but the narration eventually piles up a definition of Popism as celebration of the most silly and least enduring parts of culture. … In a time of examination of the 1960s, this book is an interesting account of the alternative culture that wasn't remembered. The treatment is superficial, but I think that's the point."
The Miami Herald's Helen L. Kohen wrote: "The essence of Warhol's popism is disintegration, followed immediately by boredom. Though that is not a promising outline for a book, Warhol tackles it, and we must admit the boredom does succeed." Thomas Sabulis wrote for
The Boston Globe: "It's gossipy and alive, one of the best things you'll ever read about those crazy eight years—Warhol says the '60s ended in 1968. It's a Pop history in wraparound sunglasses and it reads like a dream." ==Sources==