Transient intermodulation distortion For some years following the introduction of solid-state amplifiers, their
perceived sound did not have the excellent audio quality of the best
valve audio amplifiers. This led
audiophiles to believe that tube sound had an intrinsic quality due to the vacuum tube technology itself. In 1970, Matti Otala published a paper on transient distortion. Transient distortion later became known as transient intermodulation distortion (TIM). Two years later, in a 1972 paper, Matti Otala reported that TIM was found to occur during very rapid increases in amplifier output voltage. At the time, some thought TIM was a previously unobserved form of distortion, only to be revealed by other authors in later papers that TIM was, in actuality
not unique or unobserved, since the already available measurement techniques revealed that TIM was actually slew rate distortion, which in turn was always revealed as traditionally measured harmonic distortion rising in the higher frequencies, as well as by traditionally measured intermodulation distortion. Papers also later revealed that TIM distortion was triggered not just by transients, but also by steady state sine tone measurements. Further publications by Otala and other authors found the solution for TIM distortion, including increasing slew rate, decreasing preamp frequency bandwidth, and the insertion of a lag compensation circuit in the input stage of the amplifier in a way that makes the input stage more linear.
Baxandall Theorem The next step in advanced design was the Baxandall Theorem, created by
Peter Baxandall in England. This theorem introduced the concept of comparing the ratio between the input distortion and the output distortion of an amplifier. This new idea helped audio design engineers to better evaluate the distortion processes within an amplifier.
Baxandall Effect By applying negative feedback, the Baxandall Effect can come into play, where, as the level of negative feedback is increased over a limited range, the 2nd harmonic distortion product is reduced as expected, but at the same time, the higher-order harmonic distortion products are increased instead. This has led to the myth that high levels of negative feedback are bad. However, as the level of negative feedback is increased beyond approximately 20 dB, all distortion products are further reduced, demonstrating that such higher levels of negative feedback have no downsides. == Applications ==