In 1722, Charles led informal discussions with the Hungarians, placating them with numerous land grants. When the Diet assembled in
Pressburg that year, Charles succeeded in having his proposals submitted to the
lower house. The chances of accepting his proposals were slim. The
Primate of Hungary,
Christian August of Saxe-Zeitz, was prevented from presiding over the lower house's deliberations due to fears that his sympathy for Joseph I would incline him to oppose setting Joseph's daughters aside in favor of Charles's.
Ferenc Szluha, a county
notary of
Pozsony, gave a rousing speech in the King's favor, unexpectedly securing the lower house's support. The
upper house followed suit. The Diet thus agreed in 1723 to extend the succession rights to the daughters of Charles III (Maria Theresa and Maria Anna), followed by the daughters of Joseph I (Maria Josepha and Maria Amalia), and finally by the daughters of
Leopold I (
Maria Elisabeth,
Maria Anna and
Maria Magdalena). Royal elections were to resume if these lines were to go extinct. The Diet agreed that Hungary was inseparable from the rest of the Habsburg monarchy and emphasized the need for common action, especially when it came to defense. In return, Charles solemnly reconfirmed the rights of the
estates of the realm and in particular those of the
Hungarian nobility. The Pragmatic Sanction of 1723 had great impact on the
Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867. The Hungarian statesman
Ferenc Deák argued that, according to the Pragmatic Sanction of 1723, constitutional governing of Hungary was a prerequisite of the
Habsburg rule over Hungary. The foreign policy and defense, as well as financing them, were the most important joint affairs of
Austria-Hungary, the resulting
dual monarchy, to be based on the Pragmatic Sanction of 1723. == See also ==