Example In a hypothetical market in which
supply and demand are such that the
equilibrium price and quantity are $5 and 500 units, respectively, and the government then institutes an "intervention price" at $6 per unit: The benefit to producers of the price support is equal to the gain in
producer surplus (represented in blue). • 1800 - 1250 =
$550 The cost to consumers of the price support is equal to the loss in
consumer surplus (represented in red). • 1250 - 800 =
$450 The cost to the government of the price support is equal to the cost of the surplus in the market (represented in gray). • 6 * 200 =
$1200 However, since the consumers ultimately pay taxes for the government to purchase the surplus, the total cost to consumers (in the short run) of the price support is the sum of the loss in consumer surplus and the cost of the government purchasing the surplus off the market. • 450 + 1200 =
$1650 In other words, consumers are paying
$1650 in order to benefit producers
$550 so price supports are considered inefficient. The
deadweight loss is the efficiency lost by implementing the price-support system. It is the change in total surplus and includes the value of the government purchase, and is equal to $1100. ==See also==